Hey,
Thank you both for your help :)
I was missing this point in the Pregel model. I thought it would be
expected to receive empty message iterators.
Yes, I know it is not the best use-case for vertex-centric iteration as
there are well-defined steps, and also know the Flink examples. I only
want
Hi Gabor,
the vertex-centric iteration implements the Pregel model, according to
which a vertex is "active" during a superstep only when there are messages
for this vertex. So, the behavior you are seeing is intended, yes :-)
The logic behind this is that a vertex value gets updated by performing
Hello Gabor,
Yes, currently updateVertex only gets called when a new message was
received.
Could you please describe the logic behind your triangle count? The one I
know is described at the beginning of page 1643 in this article:
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~bader/papers/GraphBSPonXMT-MTAAP2013.pdf
