Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-11 Thread xiangyu feng
Hi devs, Thanks for all the feedback. If there are no more comments, I would like to start a vote for this FLIP, thanks again! Best, Xiangyu Feng Weihua Hu 于2024年1月9日周二 14:45写道: > Thanks for proposing this FLIP. > > Experiments have shown that it significantly enhances the real-time query > ex

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-08 Thread Weihua Hu
Thanks for proposing this FLIP. Experiments have shown that it significantly enhances the real-time query experience. +1 for this. Best, Weihua On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 5:19 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Xiangyu for the quick update! > > LGTM > > Best, > Rui > > On Mon, Jan 8

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-08 Thread Rui Fan
Thanks Xiangyu for the quick update! LGTM Best, Rui On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 4:27 PM xiangyu feng wrote: > Hi Rui and Yong, > > Thx for ur reply. > > My initial attention here is that for short-lived jobs under high QPS: a > fixed delay retry strategy will cause extra resource waste and not flex

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-08 Thread xiangyu feng
Hi Rui and Yong, Thx for ur reply. My initial attention here is that for short-lived jobs under high QPS: a fixed delay retry strategy will cause extra resource waste and not flexible enough, an exponential-backoff strategy might significantly increase the query latency since the interval time gr

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-07 Thread Rui Fan
Only one strategy is fine to me. When the multiplier is set to 1, the exponential-delay will become fixed-delay. So fixed-delay may not be needed. Best, Rui On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:17 PM Yong Fang wrote: > I agree with @Rui that the current configuration for Flink Client is a > little complex

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-07 Thread Yong Fang
I agree with @Rui that the current configuration for Flink Client is a little complex. Can we just provide one strategy with less configuration items for all scenarios? Best, Fang Yong On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:19 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks xiangyu for driving this proposa

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-07 Thread Rui Fan
Thanks xiangyu for driving this proposal! And sorry for the late reply. Overall looks good to me, I only have some minor questions: 1. Do we need to introduce 3 collect strategies in the first version? Large and comprehensive configuration items will bring additional learning costs and usage cos

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-06 Thread xiangyu feng
Hi all, Thanks for the comments. If there is no further comment, we will open the voting thread next week. Regards, Xiangyu Zhanghao Chen 于2024年1月3日周三 16:46写道: > Thanks for driving this effort on improving the interactive use experience > of Flink. The proposal overall looks good to me. > > B

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-03 Thread Zhanghao Chen
Thanks for driving this effort on improving the interactive use experience of Flink. The proposal overall looks good to me. Best, Zhanghao Chen From: xiangyu feng Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 16:51 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improv

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-01 Thread Yangze Guo
Thanks for driving this, Xiangyu! +1 for the overall proposal. I believe this will enhance the availability and competitiveness of Flink in OLAP scenarios. Best, Yangze Guo On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 4:51 PM xiangyu feng wrote: > > Hi devs, > > I'm opening this thread to discuss FLIP-407: Improve