Hi, Hang.
I think what you're actually trying to say is Kudu & HBase & RabbitMQ.
1. For Hbase, I see there is a pr to bump 1.18 and support 1.18/1.19, We are
currently discussing in the community[2] whether to show support for adding
1.20.
2. For RabbitMQ, I see there is a pr to bump 1.19[3] and
Hi, Yanquan.
Thanks for this discussion.
Flink 1.20 has been released for two months and only kafka connector
supports this version by now. It is reasonable to create an issue to track
this content.
For connectors whose latest supported version are 1.17(ES & HBase &
RabbitMQ), I am considering wh
What is the status here: https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/12
Please give feedback.
On 10/28/2015 11:02 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> Thanks Matthias! I made a comment. Please open a pull request.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>> Just updated this. Improv
Thanks Matthias! I made a comment. Please open a pull request.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Just updated this. Improved the layout and added FastR project.
>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 10/27/2015 03:25 AM, Matth
Just updated this. Improved the layout and added FastR project.
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page
-Matthias
On 10/27/2015 03:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated the flink-external section on the Flink Web-Page:
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/fl
Hi,
I updated the flink-external section on the Flink Web-Page:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page
The section is now located in "Contribute" page. The layout needs some
refinement though... Some Project are "previews", ie, Flink support was
announced but there is not inf
Yes, Community is a better place. You can also add the Dataflow Runner
https://github.com/dataArtisans/flink-dataflow.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
wrote:
> Thank you Matthias!
>
> I'm not sure where the "Downloads" section is the right place for this.
> I would actually put i
Thank you Matthias!
I'm not sure where the "Downloads" section is the right place for this.
I would actually put it under "Community", with a header "External
Contributions" or something like this, but I'm not feeling strong about
this :)
-Vasia.
On 9 October 2015 at 15:29, Matthias J. Sax wro
I was not sure what we should add and was hoping for input from the
community.
I am aware of the following projects we might want to add:
- Zeppelin
- SAMOA
- Mahout
- Cascading (dataartisan repo)
- BigPetStore
- Gradoop
-Matthias
On 10/09/2015 03:07 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
Cool. Right now the list is empty. Do you already have a list you
could include in the upcoming pull request? :)
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just started this. Please see
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page
>
> I think, it is the be
Hi,
I just started this. Please see
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page
I think, it is the best way to extend the "Downloads" page. I would also
add a link to this on the main page's "Getting Started" section.
As a first try, I started like this:
> Third party packages
>
IMHO we can do that. There should be a disclaimer that the third party
software is not officially supported.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Should we add a new page at Flink project web page?
>
> On 10/08/2015 12:56 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>> +1 for your pragmatic
Should we add a new page at Flink project web page?
On 10/08/2015 12:56 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> +1 for your pragmatic approach, Vasia. A simple collection of third
> party software using Flink should be enough for now; of course,
> outside the Apache realm.
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:4
+1 for your pragmatic approach, Vasia. A simple collection of third
party software using Flink should be enough for now; of course,
outside the Apache realm.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Chiwan Park wrote:
> +1 for Vasia’s suggestion. From a long-term perspective, the site like Spark
> Packa
+1 for Vasia’s suggestion. From a long-term perspective, the site like Spark
Packages [1] would be helpful to manage external contribution.
[1] http://spark-packages.org
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I think, the repository does not nee
Thanks for the feedback.
I think, the repository does not need to build on a single Flink
release. From my point of view, there should be a single parent module
that contains *independent modules* for each extension/library (there
should be no "cross dependencies" between the modules and each modu
+1 for Vasia's suggestion. It's a good and pragmatic start.
Putting such contributions into an Apache-managed repository might have
some side effects.
2015-10-08 12:15 GMT+02:00 Vasiliki Kalavri :
> How about, for now, we simply create a page where we gather links/short
> descriptions of all the
How about, for now, we simply create a page where we gather links/short
descriptions of all these contributions
and let the maintenance and dependency management to the tool/library
creators?
This way we will at least have these contributions in one place and link to
them somewhere from the website
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for bringing up this idea. Actually, it has been discussed a
couple of times on the mailing list whether we should have a central
place for third-party extensions/contributions/libraries. This could
either be something package-based or, like you proposed, another
repository.
A
19 matches
Mail list logo
