That would be great, thank you!
Please write down everything you see and post it on the mailing list.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Szabó Péter
wrote:
> @Robert: I have a little storm experience. I will try to run some examples
> on the cluster.
>
> Peter
>
> 2015-05-12 11:40 GMT+02:00 Matth
@Robert: I have a little storm experience. I will try to run some examples
on the cluster.
Peter
2015-05-12 11:40 GMT+02:00 Matthias J. Sax :
> Hi,
>
> some UnsupportedOperationExceptions are required, because Storm
> interfaces are implement but Flink cannot support those functionality.
> Some
Hi,
some UnsupportedOperationExceptions are required, because Storm
interfaces are implement but Flink cannot support those functionality.
Some other are "not yet implemented" once.
A few other of them could be removed (in case an interface in not
implemented, but only mimicked), by removing the
+1 to merge it to contrib.
We should hold a path open that
- inactive code gets dropped from contrib after a while
- very active code may gets its own project (inside or outside the Flink
codebase, whatever fits better)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Márton Balassi
wrote:
> The purpose of
Hi,
Thank you for starting the discussion Marton!
I would really like to merge the storm compat to our source repo. I think
that code which is not merged there will not get enough attention.
I'm against splitting flink-contrib into small maven modules. I totally
understand your reasoning (mixed
