Re: [DISCUSS] A strategy for merging the Blink enhancements

2019-01-23 Thread Till Rohrmann
+1 for Stephan's merge proposal. I think it makes sense to pause the development of the Table API for a short time in order to be able to quickly converge on a common API. >From my experience with the Flip-6 refactoring it can be challenging to catch up with a branch which is actively developed. T

Re: [DISCUSS] A strategy for merging the Blink enhancements

2019-01-23 Thread Stephan Ewen
I think that is a reasonable proposal. Bugs that are identified could be fixed in the blink branch, so that we merge the working code. New feature contributions to that branch would complicate the merge. I would try and rather focus on merging and let new contributions go to the master branch. On

Re: [DISCUSS] A strategy for merging the Blink enhancements

2019-01-22 Thread Zhang, Xuefu
Hi Stephan, Thanks for bringing up the discussions. I'm +1 on the merging plan. One question though: since the merge will not be completed for some time and there are might be uses trying blink branch, what's the plan for the development in the branch? Personally I think we may discourage big c