ld be encouraging them to use the usual
Apache processes- though maybe we could nudge individuals to get open
discussions going.
Kind regards, David
From: Pedro Mázala
Date: Tuesday, 18 March 2025 at 12:13
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Community review process improvement pro
subsequent automation from
the community,
Kind regards, David.
From: Pedro Mázala
Date: Wednesday, 19 March 2025 at 10:38
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Community review process improvement proposal
Any time. More than happy to help in any way I can.
On the subscription
esses- though maybe we could nudge individuals
> to get open discussions going.
>
> Kind regards, David
>
> From: Pedro Mázala
> Date: Tuesday, 18 March 2025 at 12:13
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Community review process improvement proposal
> I think
I think this is a great way of keeping things tidy. Thank you for the work
being done here.
I have some thoughts to share:
- About the tag `community-reviewed-required-deep-review`, would it be manually
added or something @FlinkBot would be capable of doing?
- How the committers/PMCs could re
I think this is a great way of keeping things tidy. Thank you for the work
being done here.
I have some thoughts to share:
- About the tag `community-reviewed-required-deep-review`, would it be
manually added or something @FlinkBot would be capable of doing?
- How the committers/PMCs could rely on
