gt; > Best Regards,
> >
> > Jiayi Liao
> >
> > Original Message
> > *Sender:* vino yang
> > *Recipient:* Georgi Stoyanov
> > *Cc:* dev; user; Stefan
> > Richter; Aljoscha Krettek;
> > kklou...@gmail.com; Stephan Ewen;
> > l...@apache.org; Tz
Tai
> *Date:* Tuesday, Jul 2, 2019 16:45
> *Subject:* Re: RE: [DISCUSS] Improve Queryable State and introduce
> aQueryServerProxy component
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the past, I have tried to further refine the design of this topic
> thread and wrote a design document to give mor
richters.rich...@ververica.com; Aljoscha krettekaljos...@apache.org;
kkloudas@gmail.comkklou...@gmail.com; Stephan ewense...@apache.org;
liyu@apache.orgl...@apache.org; Tzu-Li (Gordon) taitzuli...@apache.org
Date:Tuesday, Jul 2, 2019 16:45
Subject:Re: RE: [DISCUSS] Improve Queryable State and introduce
Hi Jiayi,
Thanks for your reply and glad to hear that you have taken some effort for
it, the potential contribution is also welcome.
I also want to explore it in depth. Currently, let's listen to the
community's opinions.
Best,
Vino.
bupt_ljy 于2019年4月26日周五 下午9:54写道:
> Hi yang,
> +1 for this
Hi yang,
+1 for this proposal. Queryable state is a very common usage in our scenarios
when we debug and query the realtime status in streaming process like CEP. And
we’ve done a lot to improve the “user experience” of this feature like exposing
the taskmanager’s proxy port in TaskManagerInfo.