Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
Hi Ferenc
Could you please help to create a FLIP page if everything looks fine from
the above discussion/google doc. Thanks in advance.
Regards
Lajith K
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 12:02 PM Lajith Koova wrote:
> Thank you
r committer to do this please; so we can get this
>> moving.
>> >
>> > Kind regards, David.
>> >
>> > From: Lajith Koova lajith...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Date: Monday, 14 October 2024 at 08:52
>> > To: dev@flink.apache.org dev@flin
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> > From: Lajith Koova lajith...@gmail.com
> >
> > Date: Monday, 14 October 2024 at 08:52
> > To: dev@flink.apache.org dev@flink.apache.org
> >
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink
>
ion mode.”. I am not sure I understand.
> > >
> > > * I thought we have 1 condition per Flink job state, so I assume we
> > > have one true condition and potentially other historical false ones.
> > > * When you say during transition, are you thinking of some
over or
get another committer to do this please; so we can get this moving.
Kind regards, David.
From: Lajith Koova
Date: Monday, 14 October 2024 at 08:52
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
Thank you all for the valuable
dition and potentially other historical false ones.
> > * When you say during transition, are you thinking of some small time
> > window between states. I am not sure what you are saying here.
> >
> >
> > Kind regards , David
> >
> >
> &g
indow between states. I am not sure what you are saying here.
>
>
> Kind regards , David
>
>
> From: Lajith Koova
> Date: Wednesday, 11 September 2024 at 03:01
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
> Hi,
etween states. I am not sure what you are saying here.
>
>
> Kind regards , David
>
>
> From: Lajith Koova
> Date: Wednesday, 11 September 2024 at 03:01
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
> Hi,
gs from ResourceLifecycleState and with reasons). Can I
>> > check that the 2 proposed conditions would also be useful additions? I
>> > assume that in your proposal when jobReady is true, then
>> UpgradeCompleted
>> > condition would not be present and ClusterReady would
2 proposed conditions would also be useful additions? I
> > assume that in your proposal when jobReady is true, then
> UpgradeCompleted
> > condition would not be present and ClusterReady would always be true? I
> > know conditions do not need to be orthogonal, but I wanted to ch
related readiness condition related to it’s
> > health would be useful; you suggest it be user configurable – this seems
> > closer to a liveliness / readiness probe.
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> > From: Mate Czagany
> > Date: Thursday, 30 May 2024 at 1
ems
> closer to a liveliness / readiness probe.
>
> Kind regards, David.
>
> From: Mate Czagany
> Date: Thursday, 30 May 2024 at 10:39
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Cc: morh...@apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
> Hi,
>
&
condition would not be present and ClusterReady would always be true? I
> > know conditions do not need to be orthogonal, but I wanted to check what
> > your thoughts are.
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gyula Fóra
> >
resent and ClusterReady would always be true? I
> > know conditions do not need to be orthogonal, but I wanted to check what
> > your thoughts are.
> >
> > Kind regards, David.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gyula Fóra
> > Date: Wed
t;
>
>
> From: Gyula Fóra
> Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 15:28
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Cc: morh...@apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
> Hi David!
>
> This change definitely warrants a FLIP even if t
thoughts are.
Kind regards, David.
From: Gyula Fóra
Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 15:28
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Cc: morh...@apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Add K8S conditions to Flink CRD
Hi David!
This change definitely warrants a FLIP even if the code change is not
Hi David!
This change definitely warrants a FLIP even if the code change is not huge,
there are quite some implications going forward.
Looping in @morh...@apache.org for this discussion.
I have some questions / suggestions regarding the condition's meaning and
naming.
In your proposal you have
Hi,
Thanks Lajith for raising this discussion thread under the Flip title.
To summarise the concerns from the other discussion thread.
“
- I echo Gyula that including some examples and further explanations might ease
reader's work. With the current version, the FLIP is a bit hard to follow. -
W
18 matches
Mail list logo
