You can
> > > still
> > > > run an interactive session with many jobs one after another.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Maximilian Michels
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
ed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Maximilian Michels
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > However, dropping it completely instead of improving it would make
> > > Flink
> > > > > setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right
> > > setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not really, because you could also use YARN on dedicated clusters for
> > > proper multi-user support.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Fabian Hue
t; > >
> > > However, dropping it completely instead of improving it would make
> Flink
> > > setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
> > >
> >
> > Not really, because you could also use YARN on dedicated clusters for
> > proper multi-user s
dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
> > >
> >
> > Not really, because you could also use YARN on dedicated clusters for
> > proper multi-user support.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Fabian Hueske
> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree t
nstead of improving it would make Flink
> > setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
> >
>
> Not really, because you could also use YARN on dedicated clusters for
> proper multi-user support.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> > I
:
> I agree that Flink's multi-user support is not very good at the moment.
> However, dropping it completely instead of improving it would make Flink
> setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
>
>
> 2015-04-29 17:33 GMT+02:00 Maximilian Michels :
>
> > Hi ev
at 5:51 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> > I agree that Flink's multi-user support is not very good at the moment.
> > However, dropping it completely instead of improving it would make Flink
> > setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
> &g
Tough question.
I'd actually rather go for "single user" and "multi user" through YARN,
than a not really thought through multi-user version.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> I agree that Flink's multi-user support is not very good at t
I agree that Flink's multi-user support is not very good at the moment.
However, dropping it completely instead of improving it would make Flink
setups on dedicated clusters quite useless, right?
2015-04-29 17:33 GMT+02:00 Maximilian Michels :
> Hi everyone,
>
> Currently Flin
Hi everyone,
Currently Flink accepts jobs from multiple clients and executes them
concurrently if the resource limits are not exceeded. However, the
multi-user support is very poor. We don't support queuing of jobs and
concurrent jobs have to share resources in a nice way. Otherwise, jobs will
fai
11 matches
Mail list logo
