Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Till Rohrmann
We should ping the Zeppelin guys to update their Flink dependency. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > I'm so happy we have pushed it out :) It took a while but I think we can be > very pleased with the result. > > I will post an announcement to the user/dev and the Apac

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Maximilian Michels
I'm so happy we have pushed it out :) It took a while but I think we can be very pleased with the result. I will post an announcement to the user/dev and the Apache announce mailing list. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Chiwan Park wrote: > Great! We should post the announcement mail to user m

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Chiwan Park
Great! We should post the announcement mail to user mailing list :) Regards, Chiwan Park > On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > Great that this release is out, finally :-) > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > >> I've published the announcement: >>

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Stephan Ewen
Great that this release is out, finally :-) On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > I've published the announcement: > > http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html > > Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Maximilian Michels
I've published the announcement: http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the word! Cheers, Max On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > Thanks for your feedback. We man

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Maximilian Michels
Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document quite a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false impression to people reading the release announcement because the real issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA issues. Of c

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hi, thank you Max for the nice document! Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues? -Vasia. On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen wrote: > I like the announcement now. > > Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early > versions of the libraries, that they

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Stephan Ewen
I like the announcement now. Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not yet performance optimized. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Stephan Ewen
I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance. I think the release announcement needs to be about the core points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a link for details for those interested in the details. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > I

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery". On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels wrote: > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are published > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release > announcement. If nobody ha

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-24 Thread Maximilian Michels
Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are published on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass and publish the announcement. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > I al

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-23 Thread Stephan Ewen
I also like a separate paragraph about it :-) On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > I would add a separate paragraph about it! > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther wrote: > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about it > > or is bet

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-23 Thread Robert Metzger
I would add a separate paragraph about it! On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther wrote: > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about it > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section? > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote: > >> Th

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-23 Thread Timo Walther
Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about it or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section? On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote: Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit differently, updating it. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 a

Re: Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-23 Thread Márton Balassi
Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit differently, updating it. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > Hi everyone, > > With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release > announcement. I've created a document which basically contain

Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

2015-06-23 Thread Maximilian Michels
Hi everyone, With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the milestone release announcement with a few changes. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiop