+1 (non-binding)
Sergey Nuyanzin 于2022年12月18日周日 15:42写道:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:06 PM David Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser <
> martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm b
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:06 PM David Anderson wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
> >
> > If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to updat
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
>
> If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update
> our Scala 2.12 version (see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As expla
Hi all,
I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update our
Scala 2.12 version (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As
explained before in the discussion thread, that means that we would break
binary & sa
@Nick Have you checked whether this really affects Flink`?
Asking since the regressions doesn't categorically affect every mixed
code base.
On 13/06/2022 16:50, Nick wrote:
I think upgrading to 2.12.15 would be the correct choice, as 2.12.16 has a
known regression for projects compiled with Ja
I think upgrading to 2.12.15 would be the correct choice, as 2.12.16 has a
known regression for projects compiled with Java & Scala, which Flink does:
https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.12.16
This regression will be addressed in a few months via 2.12.17, so for now
2.12.15 should be go
+1 (binding)
Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao :
> +1 non-binding
>
> for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know
> about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
> btw, the configuration
> of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match ta
+1 non-binding
for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know
about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
btw, the configuration
of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8, target-11 jvm
format.
Martijn Visser 于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道:
> Hi eve
Hi everyone,
As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread for updating
Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there will be a
binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed.
For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that best fits
with