Thanks all, this vote is now closed. I will announce the results in a
separate thread.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:21 AM Danny Cranmer
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Release notes look ok
> - Verified signature and hashes of source archive
> - Tag is present in Github
> - Contents of Maven repo look
+1 (binding)
- Release notes look ok
- Verified signature and hashes of source archive
- Tag is present in Github
- Contents of Maven repo look good
- No binaries in the source archive
- Built source with Maven, tests pass
- Verified NOTICE files
- NOTICE file year needs updating to 2023, however
+1 (non-bindnig)
- Checked JIRA release notes
- verified hashes
- verified signatures
- built from source code succeeded
- checked Github release tag
- verified pom files point to version
- reviewed and Approved web PR
Best
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 02:43, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 (bin
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked Github release tag
- built from source code succeeded
- reviewed the web PR
Best,
Leonard
> On Apr 20, 2023, at 2:41 AM, Martijn Visser wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Validated hashes
> - Verified signature
> - Verified that n
+1 (binding)
- Validated hashes
- Verified signature
- Verified that no binaries exist in the source archive
- Build the source with Maven
- Verified licenses
- Verified web PRs
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 9:55 AM Samrat Deb wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 1:23 PM, Teoh, Hong
+1 (non binding)
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 1:23 PM, Teoh, Hong
wrote:
> Thanks Danny
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Hashes and Signatures look good
> * All required files on dist.apache.org
> * Tag is present in Github
> * Verified source archive does not contain any binary files
> * Source archive bui
Thanks Danny
+1 (non-binding)
* Hashes and Signatures look good
* All required files on dist.apache.org
* Tag is present in Github
* Verified source archive does not contain any binary files
* Source archive builds using maven
Cheers,
Hong
> On 14 Apr 2023, at 06:36, Elphas Toringepi wrote:
Thanks Danny
+1 (non-binding)
* Checked JIRA release notes
* Verified signature and checksum for Apache source
* Checked source code tag
* Confirmed Github and Apache source releases are identical
* Source code builds (JDK 11)
* Approved website pull request
Kind regards,
Elphas
On Thu, Apr 13
Thanks, Danny.
+1 (non-binding).
Best,
Jiabao
> 2023年4月13日 下午11:20，Danny Cranmer 写道：
>
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #${RC_NUM} for the version
> ${NEW_VERSION}, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #${RC_NUM} for the version
${NEW_VERSION}, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This version supports both Flink 1.16.x and Flink 1.17.x
The complete staging area
10 matches
Mail list logo
