Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-29 Thread Robert Metzger
Thank you for testing the RC Gyula! Regarding the other reported JIRAs: These issues are resolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5670 (merged) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5667 (merged) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5660 (merged) https://issues.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-27 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
I think this issue that Ufuk opened is also a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5670 As I comment in the Issue, at least one bigger user of Flink has run into this problem on their cluster. On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 at 10:50 Ufuk Celebi wrote: > Thanks Gyula! > > The current state

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-27 Thread Ufuk Celebi
Thanks Gyula! The current state of things is: - Stefan is working on a fix for  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5663. - Till is working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5667. As far as I can tell, these will be fixed today and we are ready to go for RC3. I resolved the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Gyula Fóra
Hi, Aside from the issues mentioned above I have some good news as well. I have finished porting and started testing one of our major production jobs (RBea) on 1.2 and everything seems to run well so far, with savepoints, rescaling, externalized checkpoints, metrics etc. on YARN. In this job I u

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Robert Metzger
Damn. I really hoped that this RC goes through. I propose to keep the RC2 open until we've fixed all issues mentioned here and to get some more testing feedback. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > @Till - I think that FLINK-5667 is a blocker > > Good catch finding it! > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Stephan Ewen
@Till - I think that FLINK-5667 is a blocker Good catch finding it! On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > I have found another problem: Under certain circumstances Flink can lose > state data by completing an invalid checkpoint. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-56

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Till Rohrmann
I have found another problem: Under certain circumstances Flink can lose state data by completing an invalid checkpoint. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5667. Cheers, Till On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > Robert also found an issue that pending checkpoint file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Till Rohrmann
Robert also found an issue that pending checkpoint files are not properly cleaned up: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5660. To my surprise, the issue was already fixed in 1.1.4 so I guess I've forgotten to forward port the fix. There is a pending PR to fix it. The fix could also be part

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Ufuk Celebi
I ran some tests and found the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5663: Checkpoint fails because of closed registry => This happened a couple of times for the first checkpoints after submitting a job. If it happened on every submission I would definitely make this a bloc

[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-25 Thread Robert Metzger
Dear Flink community, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version 1.2.0. The commit to be voted on: 8b5b6a8b (http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/8b5b6a8b) Branch: release-1.2.0-rc2 (https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flin k.git;a=