Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-07 Thread Rui Fan
t the signature belongs to the > > owner. > > > > > > > > > > From: Alexander Fedulov > > Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2025 at 17:30 > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1 > > Hi David,

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-07 Thread Gyula Fóra
: Wednesday, 5 February 2025 at 17:30 > To: dev@flink.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1 > Hi David, > > Thanks for verifying the release. > > 1. sha256 and sha512 are not expected to be the same. Try > shasum -a 512 flink-1.20.1-b

RE: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-07 Thread David Radley
ary 2025 at 17:30 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1 Hi David, Thanks for verifying the release. 1. sha256 and sha512 are not expected to be the same. Try shasum -a 512 flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz 2. I believe you do not have my public

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-06 Thread weijie guo
g --verify flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz.asc > flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz > > > gpg: Signature made Wed 29 Jan 00:08:19 2025 GMT > > > gpg:using RSA key > 5575E80D59BBB73C15A479B88C1FC56D16B0029D > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key >

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-06 Thread Maximilian Michels
gpg:using RSA key 5575E80D59BBB73C15A479B88C1FC56D16B0029D > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key > > > > i.e. where appeared to be an error message. > > > > Am I missing something? > >kind regards, David. > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-05 Thread Alexander Fedulov
o be an error message. > > Am I missing something? >kind regards, David. > > > > From: Alexander Fedulov > Date: Wednesday, 29 January 2025 at 12:32 > To: dev > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1 > Hi everyone, > > Please

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-02-04 Thread David Radley
where appeared to be an error message. Am I missing something? kind regards, David. From: Alexander Fedulov Date: Wednesday, 29 January 2025 at 12:32 To: dev Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1 Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 fo

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-01-31 Thread Ferenc Csaky
+1 (non-binding) - verified signatures - verified hashsums - checked GH release tag - checked no binaries in source archives - built the source with jdk8 and maven 3.8.6 - reviewed web PR - deployed WordCount job to local cluster Thanks, Ferenc On Friday, January 31st, 2025 at 00:39, Yanquan

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-01-30 Thread Yanquan Lv
+1 (non-binding) I checked: - Review JIRA release notes - Verify hashes and verify signatures - Build success from source with JDK11 & maven3.8.6 - Source code artifacts matching the current release - Read the announcement blog and LGTM - Run a wordcount example in standalone cluster mode Alexand

[VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1

2025-01-29 Thread Alexander Fedulov
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.20.1, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The staging area contains the following artifacts: * JIRA release notes [1], * the official Apache