Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-23 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
--- From:Arvid Heise Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48 To:dev ; Zhijiang Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink non-binding +1 On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang .invalid> wrote: +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is meanin

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-20 Thread Piotr Nowojski
: >>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>> >>>> Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to >>> bring improvements in the discussed scenarios. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Yun >>>> >>>> >>>>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-20 Thread Nico Kruber
>> >>> Best, >>> Yun >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From:Arvid Heise >>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48 >>> To:dev ; Zhijiang >>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-

Re: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-13 Thread Zhenghua Gao
> >From:Arvid Heise > >Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48 > >To:dev ; Zhijiang > >Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink > > > >non-binding +1 > > > >On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang .invalid> >

Re:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-13 Thread Haibo Sun
narios. > >Best, >Yun > > >-- >From:Arvid Heise >Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48 >To:dev ; Zhijiang >Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink > >non-binding +1 > >On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang >wrote: > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-13 Thread Piotr Nowojski
Hi, I was checking the official list of FLIP’s [1] and just took the “Next FLIP Number: 93” (which was 92 at that time), that’s why I didn’t notice your mailing list thread from the same day. Please next time first claim the number there and update the wiki. First edit [1] by reserving the num

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-12 Thread Yun Gao
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink non-binding +1 On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang wrote: > +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is > meaningful in some scenarios. > > best

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-10 Thread Arvid Heise
ngsong Li > Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00 > To:dev > Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink > > +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving. > Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in &

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-10 Thread Zhijiang
+1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is meaningful in some scenarios. best, Zhijiang -- From:Jingsong Li Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00 To:dev Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-09 Thread Jingsong Li
+1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving. Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in FLIP page. Best, Jingsong Lee On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li wrote: > Hi Piotr, > > It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already. > see: > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-09 Thread Benchao Li
Hi Piotr, It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already. see: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog Piotr Nowojski 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道： > Hi, > > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink > as discussed

[VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

2020-01-09 Thread Piotr Nowojski
Hi, I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink as discussed in the discussion thread [1]. This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00 UTC. Piotrek [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stre