Re: [VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal

2020-02-19 Thread Yadong Xie
eb. 19 (Wed.) 22:26 > To:dev > Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal > > Thanks for starting this vote Yadong. Should we split the vote thread into > multiple vote threads for each FLIP? I fear that having them all in one > thread will quickly become confus

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal

2020-02-19 Thread Zhijiang
-- From:Till Rohrmann Send Time:2020 Feb. 19 (Wed.) 22:26 To:dev Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal Thanks for starting this vote Yadong. Should we split the vote thread into multiple vote threads for each FLIP? I fear that having them all in one thread will

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal

2020-02-19 Thread Till Rohrmann
Thanks for starting this vote Yadong. Should we split the vote thread into multiple vote threads for each FLIP? I fear that having them all in one thread will quickly become confusing. Cheers, Till On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:27 PM Piotr Nowojski wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) for FLIP-98 > +1 (b

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal

2020-02-18 Thread Piotr Nowojski
Hi, +1 (binding) for FLIP-98 +1 (binding) for FLIP-103 as well. I second Xintong's worries about searching for something in a large log file, however I agree this probably could be expanded/improved in the future. Piotrek > On 14 Feb 2020, at 03:28, Yadong Xie wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would

[VOTE] FLIP-75: Flink Web UI Improvement Proposal

2020-02-13 Thread Yadong Xie
Hi all, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-75 which proposes to provide a better experience for Flink users in web UI. In order to make the vote easier, the FLIP-75 was split into several top-level sub FLIPs: - FLIP-98: Better Back Pressure Detection