Hi,
FLIP-203 [1] Has been accepted. There were 4 binding votes and 2
non-binding in favor. None against.
Binding:
Till Rohrmann
Dawid Wysakowicz
Konstantin Knauf
Yu Li
Non-binding:
David Moravek
Anton Kalashnikov
Best,
Piotrek
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-203%3A+I
Hi,
Thank you for casting your votes. I have forgotten to set the voting
period, but let's implicitly assume it was 3 days from the creation of the
voting thread.
FLIP-203 [1] Has been accepted. There were 4 binding votes and 2
non-binding in favor. None against.
Best,
Piotrek
[1]
https://cwiki
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Piotr.
--
Best regards,
Anton Kalashnikov
26.01.2022 11:21, David Anderson пишет:
+1 (non-binding)
I'm pleased to see this significant improvement coming along, as well as
the effort made in the FLIP to document what is and isn't supported (and
where ??? remain).
On We
+1 (non-binding)
I'm pleased to see this significant improvement coming along, as well as
the effort made in the FLIP to document what is and isn't supported (and
where ??? remain).
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:58 AM Yu Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for driving this Piotr! Just one more (be
+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving this Piotr! Just one more (belated) suggestion: in the
"Checkpoint vs savepoint guarantees" section, there are still question
marks scattered in the table, and I suggest putting all TODO works into the
"Limitations" section, or adding a "Future Work" section, for ea
Thanks, Piotr. Proposal looks good.
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:20 AM David Morávek wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> D.
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > On 24/01/2022 09:56, Piotr Nowojski wro
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
D.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
> On 24/01/2022 09:56, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As there seems to be no further questions about the FLIP-203 [1] I would
> > propose to start a voting thread for
+1 (binding)
Best,
Dawid
On 24/01/2022 09:56, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
Hi,
As there seems to be no further questions about the FLIP-203 [1] I would
propose to start a voting thread for it.
For me there are still two unanswered questions, whether we want to support
schema evolution and State Pro
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:57 AM Piotr Nowojski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As there seems to be no further questions about the FLIP-203 [1] I would
> propose to start a voting thread for it.
>
> For me there are still two unanswered questions, whether we want to support
> schema
Hi,
As there seems to be no further questions about the FLIP-203 [1] I would
propose to start a voting thread for it.
For me there are still two unanswered questions, whether we want to support
schema evolution and State Processor API with native format snapshots or
not. But I would propose to ta
10 matches
Mail list logo
