Hi there,
The voting time of FLIP-171 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
There were four +1 votes, all of which are binding:
- Arvid Heise (binding)
- Danny Cranmer (binding)
- 刘建刚 (binding)
- Piotr Nowojski (binding)
Poitr had some smaller comments on the implementation details of the s
+1 (binding) vote with one remark that I posted in the discussion thread.
Best,
Piotrek
pt., 25 cze 2021 o 05:00 刘建刚 napisał(a):
> A common base for implementing sink is really helpful.
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
> liujiangang
>
> Danny Cranmer 于2021年6月24日周四 下午7:10写道：
>
> > Looking forward to s
A common base for implementing sink is really helpful.
+1 (binding)
Thanks
liujiangang
Danny Cranmer 于2021年6月24日周四 下午7:10写道：
> Looking forward to simplifying adding new destination sinks.
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, 10:46 Arvid Heise, wrote:
>
> > Thanks for preparing
Looking forward to simplifying adding new destination sinks.
+1 (binding).
Thanks
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, 10:46 Arvid Heise, wrote:
> Thanks for preparing the FLIP. +1 (binding) from my side.
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:28 PM Hausmann, Steffen
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > After the discu
Thanks for preparing the FLIP. +1 (binding) from my side.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:28 PM Hausmann, Steffen
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> After the discussion in [1], I’d like to open a voting thread for FLIP-171
> [2], which proposes a base implementation for sinks that support async
> requests.
>
> T
Hi there,
After the discussion in [1], I’d like to open a voting thread for FLIP-171 [2],
which proposes a base implementation for sinks that support async requests.
The vote will be open until June 25 (72h), unless there is an objection or not
enough votes.
Cheers, Steffen
[1]
https://mail-
