OK, thanks for the responses. I'll go ahead and include it for RC3.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> +1, since others are blocked on this
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 at 12:10 Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> I am fine with it since it only touches a utility class. So +1 to
>> inclu
+1, since others are blocked on this
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 at 12:10 Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I am fine with it since it only touches a utility class. So +1 to
> include it as well.
>
> – Ufuk
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> > There is also FLINK-3657 which was recently me
+1 from my side as well
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I am fine with it since it only touches a utility class. So +1 to
> include it as well.
>
> – Ufuk
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> > There is also FLINK-3657 which was recently merged to
I am fine with it since it only touches a utility class. So +1 to
include it as well.
– Ufuk
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> There is also FLINK-3657 which was recently merged to master.
> This feature was requested by the Mahout community and the commit changes
> the vi
There is also FLINK-3657 which was recently merged to master.
This feature was requested by the Mahout community and the commit changes
the visibility of a method in DataSetUtils.
So strictly speaking, this is not a bug fix but a new feature. On the other
hand, it is very lightweight change and doe
This vote is cancelled in favour of RC3, because of the problem raised
by Fabian.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> There is a request from the Mahout community to include a fix for
> FLINK-3762 in 1.0.2.
> Stephan gave a +1 [1] and I would also like to include it.
>
> I'm r
