ter.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > From my experience this will benefit on both contributors and
> > > >> reviewers
> > > >> > > side! Thus +1 for putting into practice as well.
> > > >> > >
> > > >
gt;
> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:18 AM Stephan Ewen
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks you for the encouraging feedback so far.
>
> > > get fewer pull requests that are disregarded.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > There are various reasons for the disregarded pull requests, one
> >> being
> >> > > that
> >> > > > fewer committers really participate in re
ven pull request requires document, its owner might no
> add
> > > it
> > > >>> at
> > > >>>> first. The PR template is a guide but not which one have to learn.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> To sum up, (1) take advantage
>>
> > >>>> Rong Rong 于2018年9月18日周二 上午7:05写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for putting the review contribution doc together, Stephan!
> > This
> > >>>> will
> > >>>>> definitely help the community
;>
> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:18 AM Stephan Ewen
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks you for the encouraging feedback so far.
> >>>>>>
eedback so far.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The overall goal is definitely to make the contribution process
>>> better
>>>>> and
>>>>>> get fewer pull requests that are disregarded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Th
t;> > > >
>> > > > The other reason I was lack of structure and lack of decision
>> making,
>> > > which
>> > > > is what I am first trying to fix here.
>> > > > A follow-up to this will definitely be to improve the contribution
e contribution
> > guide
> > > as
> > > > well.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stephan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) <
> > > > wangzhijia
contirbuting or reviewing than before, although
> we
> > > > still have some points for further progress.
> > > >
> > > > I reviewed the proposal doc, and it gives very constructive and
> > > meaningful
> > > > guides which could help bot
an before, although we
> > > still have some points for further progress.
> > >
> > > I reviewed the proposal doc, and it gives very constructive and
> > meaningful
> > > guides which could help both contributor and reviewer. I agree with the
> &g
ves very constructive and
> meaningful
> > guides which could help both contributor and reviewer. I agree with the
> > bove suggestions and wish they can be praticed well!
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhijiang
> > -------------------------
well!
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
> --
> 发件人：Till Rohrmann
> 发送时间：2018年9月17日(星期一) 16:27
> 收件人：dev
> 主 题：Re: [PROPOSAL] [community] A more structured approach to reviews and
> contributions
>
> Thanks for writing this u
contributor and reviewer. I agree with the bove
suggestions and wish they can be praticed well!
Best,
Zhijiang
--
发件人：Till Rohrmann
发送时间：2018年9月17日(星期一) 16:27
收件人：dev
主 题：Re: [PROPOSAL] [community] A more structured approach to reviews
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for raising this discussion and the previous work! I
strongly support effort to improve the process of contributions and reviews.
As you mentioned above, Flink community responses to contributions a bit
inefficiently, both for latency and quality. In my opinion the most
import
Thanks for writing this up Stephan. I like the steps and hope that it will
help the community to make the review process better. Thus, +1 for putting
your proposal to practice.
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:00 AM Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Hi Flink community members!
>
> As many of you wil
Hi Flink community members!
As many of you will have noticed, the Flink project activity has gone up
again quite a bit.
There are many more contributions, which is an absolutely great thing to
have :-)
However, we see a continuously growing backlog of pull requests and JIRA
issues.
To make sure t
17 matches
Mail list logo
