big +1
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Till Rohrmann
wrote:
> +1, there is no point in arguing with Knuth.
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > +1 as well.
> >
> > This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
> > in JIRA, which also being
+1, there is no point in arguing with Knuth.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> +1 as well.
>
> This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
> in JIRA, which also being echoed by Fabian.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Hueske
+1 as well.
This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
in JIRA, which also being echoed by Fabian.
- Henry
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1 from me as well.
>
> I'd like to add that there are many relevant issues in listed in JIRA that
> repo
+1 from me as well.
I'd like to add that there are many relevant issues in listed in JIRA that
report bugs or describe interesting / important improvements of the system.
Working on one of these issues would be a great contribution to Flink.
Cheers, Fabian
2015-08-16 18:30 GMT+02:00 Sachin Goel
I agree!
A good place to start would be to write an extensive JIRA guidelines page,
an example would be
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark.
This is quite crisp and clear.
Further, right now the corresponding guidelines for Flink are on the cwiki
page, but the ma
Hi all!
Henry raised the point about non.descriptive bug reports earlier. I would
like to bring this to everyone's mind again and add some additional
thoughts:
We are seeing a lot of issues reported right now, and a lot of pull
requests opened right now, for issues that are not really a problem.
