Dear Flink community members,
Please review and comment on https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2982.
Thanks,
Chen
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-FLIP-13-Side-Outputs-in-Flink-tp14204p14938.html
Sent from the Apache
Adding another abstract method to Collector interface is also considerably
easier from API backward compatibility point of view.
The cost could be either
1) many class with empty implementation of * void collect(OutputTag
tag, S value) *method
2) split streamrecord related classes that implement
Hi Fabian
Thanks for your feedback. sorry for late reply.
Some of comments inline. Will update FLIP-13 wiki reflect your comments.
- Will multiple side outputs of the same type be supported?
> It wasn't implemented in prototype. But should be easy to support, we
have unique id in stream record
Hi CPC,
I agree, support for side outputs would be nice for DataSet as well.
However, this is not easily possible because it would require an extensive
rewrite of the DataSet optimizer.
IMO, that's out of scope for this proposal.
Cheers, Fabian
2016-10-27 0:29 GMT+02:00 CPC :
> Is it just relat
Is it just related to stream api? This feature could be really useful for
etl scenarios with dataset api as well.
On Oct 26, 2016 22:29, "Fabian Hueske" wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> thanks for this interesting proposal. I think side output would be a very
> valuable feature to have!
>
> I went of the F
Hi Chen,
thanks for this interesting proposal. I think side output would be a very
valuable feature to have!
I went of the FLIP and have a few questions.
- Will multiple side outputs of the same type be supported?
- If I got it right, the FLIP proposes to change the signatures of many
user-defin
Hey folks,
Please give feedback on FLIP-13!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-13+Side+Outputs+in+Flink
JIRA task link to google doc
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4460
Thanks,
Chen Qin
