Hi, Till, Bruno
Thank for your reply.
Twitter’s scala programming suggestion is useful. I prefer the
alexandru/scala-best-practices.
Like this rule `2.16. Public functions SHOULD have an explicit return type`,
the class field type explicitly declaring is better for developer to read.
[1]
ht
Hi,
Twitter's Effective Scala contains very well-known and accepted conventions
for Scala:
http://twitter.github.io/effectivescala/
Cheers,
Bruno
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 at 14:16 Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Agreed. I think it's a good idea to annotate the code with as much
> information as possible t
Agreed. I think it's a good idea to annotate the code with as much
information as possible to help other people to understand it. I think it's
a good idea to include this information in the coding guidelines. But I'm
not sure whether we have a dedicated Scala coding guideline.
Cheers,
Till
On Thu
hi, all
Scala can infer the actual type if we didn’t declare its type. There also
nothing different in the byte code of java class format.
It’s convenient for write the code, but hard to read. Maybe it’s time to face
such bad smell code.
Scala check style plugin also have such rule. We can add
