Re: [DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility table

2023-09-20 Thread Jing Ge
[EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility > table > Hi Jing, > > I think it's fine to update the table to include lesser versions, as long > as we provide a link to an older version of the table, for users who might > be trying to upgrade from an older

RE: [DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility table

2023-09-18 Thread David Radley
September 2023 at 14:33 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility table Hi Jing, I think it's fine to update the table to include lesser versions, as long as we provide a link to an older version of the table, for users who might be tryi

Re: [DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility table

2023-09-15 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Jing, I think it's fine to update the table to include lesser versions, as long as we provide a link to an older version of the table, for users who might be trying to upgrade from an older Flink version to the latest, so that they are aware of potential issues that could run into. Best regard

Re: [DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility table

2023-09-14 Thread Jing Ge
Hi, According the community update policy[1] for old releases, there is another cleaner option: option 3: only keep the last three versions. Compatibility info of older versions could still be found in the old releases. If there are no concerns, the upcoming 1.18 release will choose option 3 wh

[DISCUSS]clean up the savepoints compatibility table

2023-09-14 Thread Jing Ge
Hi folks, The compatibility table[1] contains old Flink versions. Does it make sense to clean up and remove some very old versions? My proposal would be: option 1: keeping less than the last 10 versions in this table so that in most cases reader does not need to scroll to the right to read hidden