Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-30 Thread Robert Metzger
I'll create a release candidate now. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > Gordon fixed the Kinesis consumer already over the weekend. I just merged > the change. > > I'll push a hotfix for the jodatime+quickstart issue to both branches. > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:35 PM, T

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-29 Thread Robert Metzger
Gordon fixed the Kinesis consumer already over the weekend. I just merged the change. I'll push a hotfix for the jodatime+quickstart issue to both branches. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Next week Monday evening should be fine to get the Kinesis issue fix in. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-26 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
Next week Monday evening should be fine to get the Kinesis issue fix in. On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > +1 for 1.1.2 > > Looks like everything is in the release-1.1 branch already except the > Kinesis and Quickstart fix. > For the Kinesis issue Tzu-Liu Tai seems onto it

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-26 Thread Stephan Ewen
+1 for 1.1.2 Looks like everything is in the release-1.1 branch already except the Kinesis and Quickstart fix. For the Kinesis issue Tzu-Liu Tai seems onto it already. The quickstart is trivial fix. Let's aim for patch-freeze next week Monday evening? On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Fabian Hue

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-26 Thread Fabian Hueske
+1 for a 1.1.2 release. I'd like to have the Joda time exclusion removed from the Quickstart POM to include the dependency in the fat jar. Otherwise jobs with that dependency (such as the Flink training examples) fail with ClassNotFound. Robert fix that on the side in https://github.com/apache/fl

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-24 Thread Maximilian Michels
+1 for a 1.1.2 release soon. I think we should have the fixes in by the beginning of next week. Otherwise, further fixes could also make it into 1.1.3. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Gyula Fóra wrote: > Hi, > > I agree that there has been some critical issues discovered and it would be > to

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-24 Thread Gyula Fóra
Hi, I agree that there has been some critical issues discovered and it would be to get the fixes out as soon as possible :) On my side I would like to add the fixes for: FLINK-4441 FLINK-4471 Both can be critical for applications that use the RocksDB backend. Gyula Ufuk Celebi ezt írta (időpo

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-24 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
Hi Ufuk, Thanks for bringing up the discussion. There’s also a critical issue with the Kinesis connector when used with window operators downstream: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4341. This leads to unbounded state size for the window operators. I’m trying to submit the fix PR befo

[DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2

2016-08-24 Thread Ufuk Celebi
It's been ~2 weeks since we released Flink 1.1.1 and I wanted to start discussing releasing Flink 1.1.2. There have been 27 commits in the release-1.1 branch since the release, including at least one critical issue: [FLINK-4332] [checkpoints] Fix SavepointV1Serializer read() / readFully() (2 week