+1
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> should we do this refactoring for the 1.2 release?
> If yes, I'll prepare a PR for that.
>
> Cheers,
> Fabian
>
> 2016-09-26 13:55 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske :
>
>> Thanks everybody for your comments.
>>
>> I opened FLINK-4676 [1
Hi all,
should we do this refactoring for the 1.2 release?
If yes, I'll prepare a PR for that.
Cheers,
Fabian
2016-09-26 13:55 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske :
> Thanks everybody for your comments.
>
> I opened FLINK-4676 [1] for merging the connector modules.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
Thanks everybody for your comments.
I opened FLINK-4676 [1] for merging the connector modules.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4676
2016-09-26 13:17 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger :
> +1 good suggestion.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > The module would
+1 good suggestion.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> The module would have both dependencies, but both are provided anyways, so
> that would not be much of an issue, I think.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Till Rohrmann
> wrote:
>
> > I think this only holds true fo
The module would have both dependencies, but both are provided anyways, so
that would not be much of an issue, I think.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Till Rohrmann
wrote:
> I think this only holds true for modules which depend on the batch or
> streaming counter part, respectively. We could
I think this only holds true for modules which depend on the batch or
streaming counter part, respectively. We could refactor these modules by
pulling out common types which are independent of streaming/batch and are
used by the batch and streaming module.
Cheers,
Till
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:
I don't think it's that easy. The streaming connectors have flink-streaming
as dependency while the batch connectors have the batch dependencies.
Combining them would mean that users always have all dependencies, right?
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 at 15:41 Stephan Ewen wrote:
> +1 for Fabian's suggesti
+1 for Fabian's suggestion
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Swapnil Chougule
wrote:
> +1
> It will be good to have one module flink-connectors (union of streaming and
> batch connectors).
>
> Regards,
> Swapnil
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
>
+1
It will be good to have one module flink-connectors (union of streaming and
batch connectors).
Regards,
Swapnil
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> right now, we have two separate Maven modules for batch and streaming
> connectors (flink-batch-connectors
Hi everybody,
right now, we have two separate Maven modules for batch and streaming
connectors (flink-batch-connectors and flink-streaming-connectors) that
contain modules for the individual external systems and storage formats
such as HBase, Cassandra, Avro, Elasticsearch, etc.
Some of these sys
10 matches
Mail list logo