Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-03-02 Thread Xingcan Cui
Hi Visia and Greg, I totally agree with you. The basic design idea behind Flink and Gelly's API meets my personal taste well. Marking stable API must be not easy as it looks like and I don't think I am eligible to talk about it now : ) IMO, updating multiple datasets is essential for making Gell

Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-03-01 Thread Greg Hogan
Flinkā€™s stable API provides the frameworks (DataStream and DataSet). On top of these frameworks Gelly provides additional models for iterative algorithms, but there are algorithms such as Minimum Spanning Tree which do not easily map to these models (in this instance requiring nested iterations;

Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-03-01 Thread Greg Hogan
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri mailto:vasilikikala...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Greg, On 24 February 2017 at 18:09, Greg Hogan mailto:c...@greghogan.com>> wrote: > Thanks, Vasia, for starting the discussion. > > I was expecting more changes from the recent discussion on restructuri

Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-02-28 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hi Xingcan, thank you for your input! On 27 February 2017 at 14:03, Xingcan Cui wrote: > Hi Vasia and Greg, > > thanks for the discussion. I'd like to share my thoughts. > > 1) I don't think it's necessary to extend the algorithm list intentionally. > It's just like a textbook that can not cove

Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-02-27 Thread Xingcan Cui
Hi Vasia and Greg, thanks for the discussion. I'd like to share my thoughts. 1) I don't think it's necessary to extend the algorithm list intentionally. It's just like a textbook that can not cover all the existing algorithms (even if we can). Just representative and commonly used ones will be en

Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-02-24 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hi Greg, On 24 February 2017 at 18:09, Greg Hogan wrote: > Thanks, Vasia, for starting the discussion. > > I was expecting more changes from the recent discussion on restructuring > the project, in particular regarding the libraries. Gelly has always > collected algorithms and I have personally

Re: [DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-02-24 Thread Greg Hogan
Thanks, Vasia, for starting the discussion. I was expecting more changes from the recent discussion on restructuring the project, in particular regarding the libraries. Gelly has always collected algorithms and I have personally taken an algorithms-first approach for contributions. Is that managea

[DISCUSS] Gelly planning for release 1.3 and roadmap

2017-02-24 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hello squirrels, this is a discussion thread to organize the Gelly component development for release 1.3 and discuss longer-term plans for the library. I am hoping that with time-based releases, we can distribute the load for PR reviewing and make better use of our time, and also point contributo