gression in our previous POC testing. So the
> > backpressure might not be the only factor to switch to the unaligned way
> in
> > practice I guess. Anyway your
> > > inputs are valuable for us to make the final decision.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Zhijiang
>
s POC testing. So the
> backpressure might not be the only factor to switch to the unaligned way in
> practice I guess. Anyway your
> > inputs are valuable for us to make the final decision.
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhijiang
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From:Yu Li
&g
gt;
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
>
>
> ------------------
> From:Yu Li
> Send Time:2020 Feb. 26 (Wed.) 15:59
> To:dev ; Zhijiang
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
>
> Hi Zhijiang,
>
>
iang
--
From:Yu Li
Send Time:2020 Feb. 26 (Wed.) 15:59
To:dev ; Zhijiang
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
Hi Zhijiang,
Thanks for the quick reply!
For the 1st question, please allow me to confirm, that when doing asynchro
onsider if really
> necessary in future.
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> ------
> From:Yu Li
> Send Time:2020 Feb. 26 (Wed.) 12:59
> To:dev
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
>
> Hi All
,
Zhijiang
--
From:Yu Li
Send Time:2020 Feb. 26 (Wed.) 12:59
To:dev
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
Hi All,
Sorry for being late to the discussion. I've gone through the latest FLIP
document and have below ques
d continuous spilling would have to effectively persist all of the data
> anyway.
>
> > On 10 Oct 2019, at 19:51, Yun Tang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arvid
> >
> > +1 for this future which has been hoped for a long time. End-to-end
> exactly once job could benefit from
>
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
>
> From: Yun Gao
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 18:39
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
>
>Hi Arvid,
>
>Very thanks for bring up the discussion! From our side unable to
> fi
not right.
Best,
Yun
--
From:Arvid Heise
Send Time:2019 Sep. 30 (Mon.) 20:31
To:dev
Subject:[DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
Hi Devs,
I would like to start the formal discussion about FLIP-76 [1], which
.
Best,
Yun
--
From:Arvid Heise
Send Time:2019 Sep. 30 (Mon.) 20:31
To:dev
Subject:[DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned checkpoints
Hi Devs,
I would like to start the formal discussion about FLIP-76 [1], which
improves the
>
> Many users would expect this feature and also +1 from my side.
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
> --
> From:Piotr Nowojski
> Send Time:2019年10月7日(星期一) 10:13
> To:dev
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned ch
Thanks for writing up this FLIP, Arvid!
Many users would expect this feature and also +1 from my side.
Best,
Zhijiang
--
From:Piotr Nowojski
Send Time:2019年10月7日(星期一) 10:13
To:dev
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-76: Unaligned
Hi Arvid,
Thanks for coming up with this FLIP. I think it addresses the issues raised in
the previous mailing list discussion [2].
For the record: +1 from my side to implement this.
Piotrek
> On 30 Sep 2019, at 14:31, Arvid Heise wrote:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> I would like to start the formal dis
Hi Devs,
I would like to start the formal discussion about FLIP-76 [1], which
improves the checkpoint latency in systems under backpressure, where a
checkpoint can take hours to complete in the worst case. I recommend the
thread "checkpointing under backpressure" [2] to get a good idea why users
a
14 matches
Mail list logo
