Since there are no objections I'll proceed with a vote.
Best,
Dawid
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 17:30, Timo Walther wrote:
> Thanks for the update Dawid.
>
> From my point of view, the FLIP is ready for voting. Unless somebody
> else has any objections?
>
> Cheers,
> Timo
>
>
> On 15.01.25 10:20, Da
Thanks for the update Dawid.
From my point of view, the FLIP is ready for voting. Unless somebody
else has any objections?
Cheers,
Timo
On 15.01.25 10:20, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
Sure, I updated the FLIP
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 15:20, Timo Walther wrote:
Hi Dawid,
thanks for proposing
Sure, I updated the FLIP
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 15:20, Timo Walther wrote:
> Hi Dawid,
>
> thanks for proposing this FLIP. It nicely completes the serialization
> effort started with FLIP-393. I know naming is difficult, but could we
> shorten and simplify the signatures further?
>
> My suggest
Hi Dawid,
thanks for proposing this FLIP. It nicely completes the serialization
effort started with FLIP-393. I know naming is difficult, but could we
shorten and simplify the signatures further?
My suggestion would be:
OperationSerializationContext -> SqlSerializationContext
ExpressionSerial
Hi all,
I'd like to start a discussion on adding a context to Operation and
Expression SQL serialization stack to allow for serializing more expression
that require custom handling, such as inline functions. Please see[1] for
details.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Best,
Dawid
[1] https://cw
