Hi all,
The hints proposed in FLIP-313 can be added later if needed.
That sounds good. Will definitely take that as a followup task to
consider.
So I'm +1 to continue with this FLIP, unless there are objections from
> others?
Since it doesn't seem that there were any objections, I'm going to
Hi all,
The FLIP looks good to me and I think as well that we should continue with
it.
The hints proposed in FLIP-313 can be added later if needed.
Thanks, Fabian
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:50 PM Timo Walther wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> thanks for giving us some context. It looks like FLIP-313 has n
Hi Alan,
thanks for giving us some context. It looks like FLIP-313 has not seen
any progress for 2 years. We can still revive FLIP-313 for the hint
discussion but start with config options. It makes sense that there is
consistency between AsycScalarFunction and AsyncTableFunction with
respect
I just wanted to add a little bit to my response as I considered the
previous FLIP.
I support FLIP-313 and the proposal of the original author. I wasn't trying
to take it over, but wanted to show renewed interest.
I'm also focused on a smaller MVP, which is why I omitted hint
support, which seeme
Thanks for the responses Timo, Dawid.
> However, why have you decided to resubmit the FLIP with a newer number
> rather than following up on FLIP-313? The only difference I see between the
> two FLIPs is the options/hints design. Could you elaborate where the
> differences come from?
I think yo
Generally what is suggested here makes sense to me.
However, why have you decided to resubmit the FLIP with a newer number
rather than following up on FLIP-313? The only difference I see between the
two FLIPs is the options/hints design. Could you elaborate where the
differences come from?
Best,
Hi Alan,
thanks for proposing this FLIP. I agree that AsyncTableFunction is very
similar to AsyncScalarFunction and luckily, the Python component has
laid the foundation for this proposal.
Nothing to add from my side.
+1 for voting.
Regards,
Timo
On 02.01.25 20:47, Alan Sheinberg wrote:
I
I'd like to start a discussion of FLIP-498: AsyncTableFunction for async
table function support [1]
This feature proposes exposing AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined
function. The type already exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as
other UDFs. This FLIP would bring it up to parity
