an long enough, a checkpoint will be
> >>> available for it.
> >>>
> >>> For the later "stop" is the appropriate term, and it means that a job
> >>> should process no messages after the checkpoints barrier and that it
> >> should
> >>> ensure tha
oints barrier and that it
>> should
>>> ensure that exactly-once sinks complete their two-phase commits
>>> successfully. If a savepoint was requested, one should be created.
>>>
>>> So in my mind there are two commands, cancel and stop, with appropriate
>&g
he checkpoint barrier during
> > stop is merely an optional behavior, like creation of a savepoint. But
> if
> > a specific command for it is desired, then "drain" seems appropriate.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >
> >
rain" seems appropriate.
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > Hi Elias!
> >
> > I remember you brought this missing feature up in the past. Do you think
> > the proposed enhancement would work for your use case?
> >
> > Best,
>
I remember you brought this missing feature up in the past. Do you think
> the proposed enhancement would work for your use case?
>
> Best,
> Stephan
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Kostas Kloudas
> Date: Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:28 PM
> Subject:
Thanks for bringing us this discussion.
I like the idea. It's really useful in production scenario.
+1 for the proposal.
jincheng sun 于2019年2月13日周三 上午9:35写道：
> Thank you for starting the discussion about cancel-with-savepoint Kostas.
>
> +1 for the FLIP.
>
> Cheers,
> Jincheng
>
> Fabian Hueske
thanks for starting this discussion. It is a very cool feature.
+1 for the FLIP
Best
Guowei
jincheng sun 于2019年2月13日周三 上午9:35写道：
> Thank you for starting the discussion about cancel-with-savepoint Kostas.
>
> +1 for the FLIP.
>
> Cheers,
> Jincheng
>
> Fabian Hueske 于2019年2月13日周三 上午4:31写道：
>
Thank you for starting the discussion about cancel-with-savepoint Kostas.
+1 for the FLIP.
Cheers,
Jincheng
Fabian Hueske 于2019年2月13日周三 上午4:31写道：
> Thanks for working on improving cancel-with-savepoint Kostas.
> Distinguishing the termination modes would be a big step forward, IMO.
>
> Btw. th
Thanks for working on improving cancel-with-savepoint Kostas.
Distinguishing the termination modes would be a big step forward, IMO.
Btw. there is already another FLIP-33 on the way.
This one should be FLIP-34.
Cheers,
Fabian
Am Di., 12. Feb. 2019 um 18:49 Uhr schrieb Stephan Ewen :
> Thank you
Thank you for starting this feature discussion.
This is a feature that has been requested various times, great to see it
happening.
+1 for this FLIP
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kostas Kloudas
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A commonly used functionality offered by Flink is the
> "cancel-with-sav
Hi everyone,
A commonly used functionality offered by Flink is the
"cancel-with-savepoint" operation. When applied to the current exactly-once
sinks, the current implementation of the feature can be problematic, as it
does not guarantee that side-effects will be committed by Flink to the 3rd
part
11 matches
Mail list logo
