Hi Biao,
you're right. What you've described is a totally valid use case and we
should design the interfaces such that you can have specialized
implementations for the cases where you can exploit things like a common
DFS. I think Nico's design should include this.
Cheers,
Till
On Fri, Jun 16, 20
Hi Till
I agree with you about the Flink's DC. It is another topic indeed. I just
thought that we can think more about it before refactoring BLOB service.
Make sure that it's easy to implement DC on the refactored architecture.
I have another question about BLOB service. Can we abstract the BLOB
Hi Biao,
you're right that the BlobServer won't live in the JM in FLIP-6. Instead it
will either be part of the RM or the dispatcher component depending on the
actual implementation. The requirements for the BlobServer should, however,
be the same.
Concerning the question about Flink's distribute
I have the same concern with Chesnay Schepler. AFIK Flink does not support
DC as well as Mapreduce and Spark. We only support DC in DataSet API. And
DC in flink do not support local files. Is this a good change to refactor
DC too?
I have another concern, currently BLOB server has some conflicts wi
The DC does delete local files. The user requests the file through the
RuntimeContext, but
the download and local caching is completely handled by Flink.
The problems you mention is exactly why I'm suggesting to rebuild the DC
on-top of the Blob service.
If a user currently wants to use the f
Actually, I don't see the automatic cleanup you referred to but from what I
can see around the DistributedCache class and its use, it is simply a registry
for user-files whose life cycle is completely managed by the user (upload,
download, delete). Files may even reside outside of flink's contro
One thing i was wondering for a long time now is why the distributed
cache is not implemented
via the blob store.
The DC is essentially just a copy routine with local caching and
automatic cleanup, so basically what
the blob store is supposed to do (i guess).
On 13.06.2017 16:31, Nico Kruber
Hi all,
I'd like to initiate a discussion on some architectural changes for the BLOB
server which finally add a proper cleanup story, remove some dead code, and
extend the BLOB store's use for off-loaded (large) RPC messages.
Please have a look at FLIP-19 that details the proposed changes:
https
