Hi everyone,
Are there more comments about this FLIP? If not, I would like to bring up the
VOTE.
Best,
Wei
> 在 2020年9月1日，11:15，Wei Zhong 写道：
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> Thanks for your notification. I’ll remove it from the design doc.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
>> 在 2020年8月31日，21:11，Timo Walther 写道：
>>
>> H
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your notification. I’ll remove it from the design doc.
Best,
Wei
> 在 2020年8月31日，21:11，Timo Walther 写道：
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> is `reset_accumulator` still necessary? We dropped it recently in the Java
> API because it was not used anymore by the planner.
>
> Regards,
> Timo
>
Hi Wei,
is `reset_accumulator` still necessary? We dropped it recently in the
Java API because it was not used anymore by the planner.
Regards,
Timo
On 31.08.20 15:00, Wei Zhong wrote:
Hi Jincheng & Xingbo,
Thanks for your suggestions.
I agree that we should keep the user interface uniform
Hi Jincheng & Xingbo,
Thanks for your suggestions.
I agree that we should keep the user interface uniform. I'll adjust the design
to allow users to specify the result type and accumulator type via @udaf.
Best,
Wei
> 在 2020年8月31日，18:06，Xingbo Huang 写道：
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> Thanks a lot for the
Hi Wei,
Thanks a lot for the discussion.
Thanks a lot for Jincheng's suggestion of discussing FLIP-137 and FLIP-139
together.
One question is whether we can use @udaf which is introduced in FLIP-137[1]
to describe pandas udaf and general python udaf together. From the overall
view of Python User
Hi Wei,
Thanks for the discussion! Overall, + 1 for this FLIP.
One question is, can the @udaf added by flip-137 be used in General Python
UDAF?
Would be gread if we can consider it combination with FLIP-137 for design.
What do you think?
Best,
Jincheng
Wei Zhong 于2020年8月26日周三 上午11:28写道：
> Hi
Hi everyone,
I would like to start discussion about how to support General Python
User-Defined Aggregate Function on Table API.
FLIP-58[1] has already introduced the stateless Python UDF and has already been
supported in the previous releases. However the stateful Python UDF, i.e.
User-Defined
