I migrated the doc to the wiki
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Paris Carbone wrote:
> +1
>
> I like the proposal!
>
> Docs can work as supplementary medium to the wiki sometimes, in my view.
> The wiki is definitely much preferred for tracking/archiving purposes but
> it might not hurt if we so
+1
I like the proposal!
Docs can work as supplementary medium to the wiki sometimes, in my view.
The wiki is definitely much preferred for tracking/archiving purposes but it
might not hurt if we sometimes also reference a doc with a somewhat evolving
prototype there.
> On 15 Jul 2016, at 15:
So far the reactions were positive towards the proposal.
If no one objects, I am going to assume lazy consensus and mark this FLIP
as adopted.
For the process, we'll post future FLIPs in the wiki directly, rather than
in a Google Doc first.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
wrote
+1
This was my original motivation. I saw a lot of discussion on the design
docs I initiated but none of this was reflected on the ML.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:11 Robert Metzger wrote:
> Thank you for writing the proposal!
>
> I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the n
Thank you for writing the proposal!
I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the new FLIP
process is to move the discussion onto ASF infra, to record the decision
making process on the mailing list and to make ongoing activities more
visible to the community.
If we want to u
I deliberately kept it initially in the Google Doc because it is easier to
comment.
I would move it to the wiki once we have passed the initial discussion and
have converged (or are close to convergence) on the design.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Chesnay Schepler
wrote:
> shouldn't the pro
Thanks for this very first proposal! Both the proposed functionality
and the way you explained it are super nice. :-)
I think that this has been long overdue in Flink. :-) Having worked on
both the ExecutionGraph and IntermediateResults before, I agree that
these are the relevant components for th
I added a FLIP document in the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-1+%3A+Fine+Grained+Recovery+from+Task+Failures
For now, this contains the link to the Google Doc and a link to this
discussion thread. Once a Jira is created for this it should also be added
there.
On Tue,
shouldn't the proposal be contained in the wiki instead of GoogleDocs?
On 12.07.2016 19:55, Stephan Ewen wrote:
Hi all!
Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine grained
recovery from task failures
It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done during
recov
Hi all!
Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine grained
recovery from task failures
It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done during
recovery.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16S584XFzkfFu3MOfVCE0rHZ_JJgQrQuw9SXpanoMiMo
Please comment in this mail
10 matches
Mail list logo
