Sure, I would love to help on that.
Martijn Visser 于2021年9月20日周一 下午3:01写道：
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Would you be interested in moving the Flink Scala Shell to a 3rd party
> repository and make it available on flink-packages.org ?
>
> I'm planning to open a vote thread on dropping the Scala Shell shortly.
Hi Jeff,
Would you be interested in moving the Flink Scala Shell to a 3rd party
repository and make it available on flink-packages.org ?
I'm planning to open a vote thread on dropping the Scala Shell shortly.
Thanks all for your input!
Thanks,
Martijn
I'll open up a
On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 16
Thanks for bringing this up.
+1 for dropping the Scala Shell or moving it out of Apache Flink if there
is interest in the community to develop it further.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:26 PM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> +1
>
> The scala shell requires time and expertise that the contributors cannot
> prov
+1
The scala shell requires time and expertise that the contributors cannot
provide. It will be great to let the broader community have the opportunity
to foster and mature the scala shell outside the constraints imposed by the
ASF.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:02 AM Jeff Zhang wrote:
> Hi Martijn
Hi Martijn,
It is a pity that the flink community doesn't have resources to maintain
scala shell which is useful for interactive user experience. We
（Zeppelin）didn't use flink scala shell module directly, instead we
customized the flink scala shell. So we are still interested in scala shell
module
Hi everyone,
As was discussed quite a while ago, the community has planned to drop
support for Scala 2.11 [1]. I'm proposing to also drop the Scala Shell,
which was briefly discussed in the email thread for dropping Scala 2.11 [2].
The Scala Shell doesn't work on Scala 2.12 [3] and there hasn't b
