I filed a JIRA to address the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1874
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this discussion.
>
> I'm very much in favor of splitting up the connectors into separate maven
> modules.
> The transitive dependen
Thanks for bringing up this discussion.
I'm very much in favor of splitting up the connectors into separate maven
modules.
The transitive dependencies are a mess otherwise.
Also, I would not put them to "flink-dist" (=lib folder) because we would
have the dependency mess again.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2
Overall I think this is a nice approach, but let us then also discuss where
would we like to put these jars. Currently these jars are not in the lib
folder of the Flink distribution, which mean that whenever a user would
like to use them they have to package it with there usercode which is a bit
in
Exactly each streaming connector would be a separate jar:
- stream-connector-kafka
- stream-connector-rabbitmq
- stream-connector-flume
- ...
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Would this proposal also include packaging streaming connectors into
> separate source an
Would this proposal also include packaging streaming connectors into
separate source and binary jars?
- Henry
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> What do you think about dividing the streaming connectors project into
> various smaller projects, basically one per connector?
>
>
What do you think about dividing the streaming connectors project into
various smaller projects, basically one per connector?
I am personally always happy when projects offer me artifacts that contain
what I need, and not a lot of other unnecessary dependencies as well
Many people using the strea