Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-11-04 Thread Jing Ge
ould be better to move these options to a > > separate section. WDYT? > > > > Best, > > Zhanghao Chen > > > > From: Samrat Deb > > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 15:31 > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Cc: u...@flink.apache.org > > Subject:

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-11-01 Thread Junrui Lee
on. WDYT? > > Best, > Zhanghao Chen > > From: Samrat Deb > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 15:31 > To: dev@flink.apache.org > Cc: u...@flink.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well >

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-11-01 Thread Zhanghao Chen
Chen From: Samrat Deb Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 15:31 To: dev@flink.apache.org Cc: u...@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well Thanks for the proposal , +1 for adding deprecated identifier [Thought] Can we have sep

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-11-01 Thread Zhanghao Chen
options. Best, Zhanghao Chen From: Alexander Fedulov Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 18:12 To: dev@flink.apache.org Cc: u...@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well Hi Zhanghao, Thanks for the proposition. In general

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-11-01 Thread Hang Ruan
Thanks for the proposal. +1 from my side and +1 for putting them to a separate section. Best, Hang Samrat Deb 于2023年11月1日周三 15:32写道: > Thanks for the proposal , > +1 for adding deprecated identifier > > [Thought] Can we have seperate section / page for deprecated configs ? Wdut > ? > > > Bests

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-11-01 Thread Samrat Deb
Thanks for the proposal , +1 for adding deprecated identifier [Thought] Can we have seperate section / page for deprecated configs ? Wdut ? Bests, Samrat On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Fedulov < alexander.fedu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Zhanghao, > > Thanks for the proposition. > In

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-10-31 Thread Alexander Fedulov
Hi Zhanghao, Thanks for the proposition. In general +1, this sounds like a good idea as long it is clear that the usage of these settings is discouraged. Just one minor concern - the configuration page is already very long, do you have a rough estimate of how many more options would be added with

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-10-30 Thread Matthias Pohl
Thanks for your proposal, Zhanghao Chen. I think it adds more transparency to the configuration documentation. +1 from my side on the proposal On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:09 PM Zhanghao Chen wrote: > Hi Flink users and developers, > > Currently, Flink won't generate doc for the deprecated options

[DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well

2023-10-11 Thread Zhanghao Chen
Hi Flink users and developers, Currently, Flink won't generate doc for the deprecated options. This might confuse users when upgrading from an older version of Flink: they have to either carefully read the release notes or check the source code for upgrade guidance on deprecated options. I pro