>
> The RC works on this tested scope. I'll test again on RC2.
Cool, thanks for your validation，Etienne! We'll prepare the RC2 ASAP.
Best,
Leonard
>
> By the way, it seems the apache/flink-benchmarks repo did not checkout a
> branch target for flink-1.17 [1] ?
>
Thanks Yun for reporting this, I'll check apache/flink-benchmarks repo.
Best,
Leonard
ch 13, 2023 21:49
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release 1.17.0, release candidate #1
Hi,
Thanks Martijn and release managers for this RC.
I tested it in a standalone cluster on this (1) benchmark / user code
[1] https://github.com/echauchot/tpcds-benchmark-flink
The RC works on
Hi,
Thanks Martijn and release managers for this RC.
I tested it in a standalone cluster on this (1) benchmark / user code
[1] https://github.com/echauchot/tpcds-benchmark-flink
The RC works on this tested scope. I'll test again on RC2.
Best
Etienne
Le 09/03/2023 à 20:31, Martijn Visser a é
Hi Yunhong,
Thanks for the message. Technically this is not a release blocker for 1.17,
since the issue already exists in Flink 1.16. The CI isn't passing for the
PR, so it also looks like this won't be fixed soon. I've lowered the
priority to a Critical ticket, but if this isn't merged in the nex
Hi Qingsheng Ren and other release manager,
Thank you for bringing this up. There is a serious bug in planner rule
#FlinkFilterJoinRule, which will generate a wrong join plan and no result
will output:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31273 (reviewing).
This bug will be triggered by a
Thanks everyone for validating the RC!
As there are some patches to be included and signature issues, the RC1 of
1.17.0 is officially canceled. Because the ASF Nexus server is now in
maintenance, we'll build a new RC after the server gets online, which is
hopefully on Tuesday (Mar 14).
Best,
Qing
Hi Martijn,
Thanks a lot.
Fix has be merged.
Best regards,
Yingjie
Martijn Visser 于2023年3月10日周五 03:32写道：
> Hi Yingjie,
>
> Thanks for the test and identifying the issue, this is super helpful!
>
> To all others, please continue your testing on this RC so that if there are
> more blockers to be
I guess there is something wrong with signature
while checking it i got this
gpg: assuming signed data in 'flink-1.17.0-bin-scala_2.12.tgz'
gpg: Signature made Wed 08 Mar 2023 03:59:17 PM CET
gpg:using RSA key A1BD477F79D036D2C30CA7DBCA8AEEC2F6EB040B
gpg: BAD signature from "Qingsh
Hi Yingjie,
Thanks for the test and identifying the issue, this is super helpful!
To all others, please continue your testing on this RC so that if there are
more blockers to be found, we can fix them with the next RC and have
(hopefully) a successful vote on it.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Thu,
Hi community and release managers:
When testing the release candidate #1 for batch scenario, I found a
potential deadlock issue of blocking shuffle. I have created a ticket [1]
for it and marked it as blocker. I will fix it no later than tomorrow.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3
Hi everyone,
The RC1 for Apache Flink 1.17.0 has been created. This RC currently is for
preview only to facilitate the integrated testing since the release
announcement is still under review. The voting process will be triggered
once the announcement is ready. It has all the artifacts that we woul
12 matches
Mail list logo
