+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Wenjin
On 2025/06/02 01:31:08 Xintong Song wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-531: Initiate Flink Agents as a new
> Sub-Project [1], which has been discussed in this thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least
+1 (non-binding)
Best regards,
Wenjin
On 2025/01/13 06:36:52 Xu Huang wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-501: Support Window Extension in
> DataStream V2 API [1]. You can find the discussion on it here [2].
>
> The vote will last for at least 7
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for driving it!
Best regards,
Wenjin
On 2025/01/13 06:55:22 Xu Huang wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-500: Support Join Extension in DataStream
> V2 API [1]. You can find the discussion on it here[2].
>
> The vote will las
gning the interface this way?
Best,
Wenjin Xie
On 2025/01/07 16:10:59 Xu Huang wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
>
> Weijie Guo and I would like to initiate a discussion about FLIP-501:
> Support Window Extension in DataStream V2 API [1].
>
> Window are at the heart of processing infi
Congratulations Junrui~
Best regards,
Wenjin
> 2024年11月5日 19:59，Zhu Zhu 写道：
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> On behalf of the PMC, I'm happy to announce that Junrui Li has become a
> new Flink Committer!
>
> Junrui has been an active contributor to the Apache Flink project
e case diable the chain. In
this case, I think using tags is a better way than lock mechanisms, for
simplicity and ease of use for user.
Thanks,
Wenjin.
On 2024/03/30 13:22:12 Péter Váry wrote:
> Hi Wenjin,
>
> See my answers below:
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024, 10:54 wenjin wrote:
&
maintenance task. In this case, if user
do not create a single job, but enable run maintenance task in exist Flink jobs
just like use case 1, what would be the consequences? Or, is there an automatic
mechanism to avoid this issue？
Thank you.
Best,
Wenjin
On 2024/03/28 17:59:49 Péter Váry wrote:
>
