Re: [VOTE] FLIP-460: Display source/sink I/O metrics on Flink Web UI

2024-07-15 Thread Yong Fang
+1 (binding) Best, FangYong On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:14 PM Zhanghao Chen wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > Thanks for all the feedback about the FLIP-460: Display source/sink I/O > metrics on Flink Web UI [1]. The discussion > thread is here [2]. I'd like to start a vote on it. > > The vote will be

[RESULT] [VOTE] FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener

2024-03-04 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, I'm happy to announce that FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener [1] has been accepted with 9 approving votes (5 binding) [2]: - Peter Huang (non-binding) - Yangze Guo (binding) - Zhanghao Chen (non-binding) - Maciej Obuchowski (non-binding) - Gyula Fóra (binding) - Márton Ba

[VOTE] FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener

2024-02-27 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, I would like to restart a vote about FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener[1]. Previously, we added lineage related interfaces in FLIP-314. Before the interfaces were developed and merged into the master, @Maciej and @Zhenqiu provided valuable suggestions for the interface fr

Re: FW: RE: [DISCUSS] FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener

2024-02-22 Thread Yong Fang
Hi Martijn, If there're no more comments, I will start a vote for this, thanks Best, Fang Yong On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 4:53 PM Yong Fang wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > Thank you for your attention. Let me first explain the specific situation > of FLIP-314. FLIP-314 is currently in

Re: FW: RE: [DISCUSS] FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener

2024-02-20 Thread Yong Fang
add new interfaces after FLIP-314 was > accepted? If so, please move the new interfaces to a new FLIP and > start a separate vote. We can't retrospectively change an accepted > FLIP with new interfaces and a new vote. > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Yong Fang wrote: > > &

Re: FW: RE: [DISCUSS] FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener

2024-02-18 Thread Yong Fang
Hi all, If there are no more feedbacks, I will start a vote for the new interfaces in the next day, thanks Best, Fang Yong On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:30 PM Yong Fang wrote: > Hi devs, > > According to the online-discussion in FLINK-3127 [1] and > offline-discussion with Maciej Ob

Re: FW: RE: [DISCUSS] FLIP-314: Support Customized Job Lineage Listener

2024-02-07 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, According to the online-discussion in FLINK-3127 [1] and offline-discussion with Maciej Obuchowski and Zhenqiu Huang, we would like to update the lineage vertex relevant interfaces in FLIP-314 [2] as follows: 1. Introduce `LineageDataset` which represents source and sink in `LineageVerte

[RESULT] [VOTE] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2024-01-08 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, I'm happy to announce that FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink[1] has been accepted with 4 approving votes (3 binding) [2]: - Xintong Song (binding) - Zhanghao Chen (non-binding) - Zhu Zhu (binding) - weijie guo (binding) There're no disapproving votes.

Re: [Discuss] FLIP-407: Improve Flink Client performance in interactive scenarios

2024-01-07 Thread Yong Fang
I agree with @Rui that the current configuration for Flink Client is a little complex. Can we just provide one strategy with less configuration items for all scenarios? Best, Fang Yong On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:19 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks xiangyu for driving this proposa

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-403: High Availability Services for OLAP Scenarios

2024-01-07 Thread Yong Fang
Thanks Yangze for starting this discussion. I have one comment: why do we need to abstract two services as `LeaderServices` and `PersistenceServices`? >From the content, the purpose of this FLIP is to make job failover more lightweight, so it would be more appropriate to abstract two services as `

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2024-01-07 Thread Yong Fang
aching a Flink course :) > > Regards, > > — Ken > > > > > On Jan 4, 2024, at 6:40 PM, Yong Fang wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > Sorry for the late reply. After discussing with @Xintong, we think it is > better to keep the method names in the FLIP mainly for the following >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-397: Add config options for administrator JVM options

2024-01-04 Thread Yong Fang
+1 (binding) Best, Fang Yong On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:14 PM xiangyu feng wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Xiangyu Feng > > Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 于2024年1月4日周四 13:03写道: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Rui > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:45 AM Benchao Li wrote: > > > > > +

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2024-01-04 Thread Yong Fang
no more POJO > >> serializer). Fury is faster than the POJO serializer in my tests, but > this > >> would be a much bigger change. > >> > >> Though it could dramatically simplify the Flink serialization support. > >> > >> — Ken > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-397: Add config options for administrator JVM options

2023-12-26 Thread Yong Fang
+1 for this, we have met jobs that need to set GC policies different from the default ones to improve performance. Separating the default and user-set ones can help us better manage them. Best, Fang Yong On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:18 PM Benchao Li wrote: > +1 from my side, > > I also met some sc

[VOTE] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2023-12-26 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, Thanks for all feedback about the FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink [1] which has been discussed in [2]. I'd like to start a vote for it. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. [1] https://cwiki.apac

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2023-12-24 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, Thanks for all the feedback. If there are no more comments, I would like to start a vote for this FLIP, thanks again! Best, Fang Yong On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 9:12 PM Yong Fang wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Thanks for your feedback. The purpose of this FLIP is to improve the

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2023-12-20 Thread Yong Fang
; > > > — Ken > > > > PS - a separate issue is how to migrate state from Kryo to something like > > Fury, which supports schema evolution. I think this might be possible, by > > having a smarter deserializer that identifies state as being created by > > Kryo, and usi

[DISCUSS] FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink

2023-12-06 Thread Yong Fang
Hi devs, I'd like to start a discussion about FLIP-398: Improve Serialization Configuration And Usage In Flink [1]. Currently, users can register custom data types and serializers in Flink jobs through various methods, including registration in code, configuration, and annotations. These lead to

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove legacy Paimon (TableStore) doc link from Flink web navigation

2023-10-17 Thread Yong Fang
+1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:52 PM Leonard Xu wrote: > +1 > > > > 2023年10月17日 下午4:50,Martijn Visser 写道: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jingsong Li > wrote: > >> > >> Hi marton, > >> > >> Thanks for driving. +1 > >> > >> There is a PR to remove legacy Paimon > >> https://gi