Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept Flink CDC into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Sanath On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 11:16 AM Peter Huang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > Best Regards > Peter Huang > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:26 AM Jane Chan wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Jane > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 8:41 PM Lijie Wang > > wrot

Re: Apache Pinot Sink

+1 As Yupeng mentioned, we at Uber are also looking into the Pinot Sink. It would be great to collaborate on this proposal. Thanks, Sanath On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:23 AM Yupeng Fu wrote: > Hi Mats, > > Glad to see this interest! We at Uber are also working on a Pinot sink (for > BATCH execution

Re: Hope to contribute code

+1 On Sat, May 9, 2020, 7:11 PM i'mpossible <605769...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi, >     I hope to contribute some simple code to flink, But it is > difficult for me to find a problem that is suitable  > for myself among the many problems of JIRA.  > > >     I think many people will have the same proble

Re: [VOTE] [FLIP-85] Flink Application Mode

+1 (binding) On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 9:24 AM Rong Rong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -- > Rong > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:43 PM Peter Huang > wrote: > > > Hi Kostas, > > > > Thanks for the effort of combing our needs with the long term goal of > > execution mode of Flink application. > > Looking for

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve history server with log support

@Xiaogang Could please share more details about the trace mechanism you mentioned. As Rong mentioned, we are also working on something similar. On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 9:12 AM Rong Rong wrote: > Thank you for the prompt feedbacks > > @Aljoscha. Yes you are absolutely correct - adding Hadoop depend