Keith Lee created FLINK-36939:
-
Summary: High CPU Utilization with Flink Kinesis EFO Consumer
Key: FLINK-36939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36939
Project: Flink
Issue Type
Keith Lee created FLINK-36155:
-
Summary: ByteBuf.release() was not called before it's
garbage-collected
Key: FLINK-36155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36155
Project:
Keith Lee created FLINK-35853:
-
Summary: Regression in checkpoint size when performing full
checkpointing in RocksDB
Key: FLINK-35853
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35853
Project: Flink
+1 (non binding)
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 9:48 AM Zakelly Lan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Zakelly
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 3:54 PM Yuepeng Pan wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
>
very useful for users who may want to implement said limiting.
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:50 PM Piotr Nowojski wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> >> Do you know if there is a way to limit the CPU utilisation of s5cmd? I
> see
> >> worker and concurrency configura
I meant to address Piotr on the above, apologies!
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:06 AM Keith Lee
wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> > As I mentioned above, in the end I think hardcoding in Flink support for
> the `cpulimit` doesn't seem appropriate and at the
that. Can you provide
other example configuration (actual examples for MySQL/Postgres etc. would
be great) that may illustrate the usefulness of the proposal better?
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 2:01 PM Leonard Xu wrote:
> Thanks Lorenzo for kicking off this discussion.
>
, should FLIP criteria [1] be updated so that reorganisation
of public documentation fall under it as well?
Best regards
Keith Lee
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=65145551#FlinkImprovementProposals-Whatisconsidereda%22majorchange%22thatneedsaFLIP?
On Thu
me.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35369
Appreciate your thoughts and suggestions.
Best regards
Keith Lee
Keith Lee created FLINK-35369:
-
Summary: Improve `Table API and SQL` page or add new page to guide
new users to right Flink SQL option
Key: FLINK-35369
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35369
restore after
Flink statement changes.
How best should such a feature request be driven? Will a FLIP be necessary?
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 1:27 PM Martijn Visser (Jira)
wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3
the effort to fix the bug.
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:37 AM Keith Lee (Jira) wrote:
> Keith Lee created FLINK-35336:
> -
>
> Summary: SQL failed to restore from savepoint after change in
> default-parallelismF
Keith Lee created FLINK-35336:
-
Summary: SQL failed to restore from savepoint after change in
default-parallelismFlink/Flink:User
Key: FLINK-35336
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35336
+1 (non-binding)
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 04:58, Shengkai Fang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Shengkai
>
> Ron Liu 于2024年5月10日周五 12:07写道:
>
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Ron
> >
> > Jark Wu 于2024
Hi Piotr,
Thank you for the proposal. Looks great.
Along similar line of Aleks' question on memory usage.
The proposal mentions that s5cmd utilises 100% of CPU similar to Flink
1.18. However, this will be a native process outside of the JVM. Are there
risk of large/long state download starving t
+1 (non-binding)
Great work on the benchmark data.
Keith
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 4:53 AM 周仁祥 wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> ConradJam 于2024年5月7日周二 11:35写道:
>
> > +1 (no-binding)
> >
> > Piotr Nowojski 于2024年5月6日周一 20:17写道:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Piotrek
> > >
> > > pon., 6 maj 2024
16 matches
Mail list logo