Re: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-269: Properly Handling the Processing Timers on Job Termination

2022-11-23 Thread Divye Kapoor
e same mechanism to implement any > behaviour we want for the built-in operators. There should be no need to > add any separate mechanism. > > Best, > Piotrek > > śr., 23 lis 2022 o 08:21 Divye Kapoor > napisał(a): > > > Thanks Yun/Piotrek, > > > > Some br

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-269: Properly Handling the Processing Timers on Job Termination

2022-11-22 Thread Divye Kapoor
Thanks Yun/Piotrek, Some brief comments inline below. On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 1:37 AM Piotr Nowojski wrote: > Hi, > > All in all I would agree with Dawid's proposal. +1 We can add the flexibility > of how to deal with the timers in the low level API via adding a handler - > if someone needs t

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-269: Properly Handling the Processing Timers on Job Termination

2022-11-18 Thread Divye Kapoor
Hi Folks, I raised the initial issue with Yun and others (apologies for the long email below, I promise it's worth the read). Speaking as someone who has hit this issue in a practical way, Dawid's first solution is the simplest and easiest way to fix the problem without introducing additional compl