Hi
>> The voting time has passed and I'm happy to announce that we've
collected enough votes to release this RC as Flink 1.3.2.
Maybe 1.4.0, because 1.3.2 already exist =)
2017-12-12 13:58 GMT+04:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
> The voting time has passed and I'm happy to announce that we've collected
MT+04:00 Greg Hogan :
> Hi Alexey,
>
> Are you looking to create pull requests for upgrading Netty 4.0 and/or 4.1?
>
> Greg
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Alexey Demin wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Problem not directly in flink, but it you use flink wi
first step and enable select sslengine
as second step, not all in one step.
> However, if we do the change at the beginning of the next release cycle,
we
> might have enough exposure time to verify whether things work or not.
We just start 1.4 iteration and have time for testing.
Thank,
A
Hi
For now we use very old netty version.
Netty 4.0.27.Final released on 02-Apr-15
If we so worry about slice in LengthFieldBasedFrameDecoder we can add custom
LengthFieldBasedCopyFrameDecoder which extend original
LengthFieldBasedFrameDecoder and override extractFrame for keep current
behavio
Hi all
View from my prospective:
in middle of summer - 150 PR
in middle of autumn - 180
now 206.
This is mix of bugfixes and improvements.
I understand that work on new features important, but when small and
trivial fixes stay in states of PR more then 2-3 month,
then all users think about changi
Hi Ivan,
I think problem not only with CEP project.
Main contributors overloaded and simple fixes frequently are staying as PR
without merge.
You can see how amount of open PR increasing over time.
Thanks,
Alexey Diomin
2017-01-15 17:18 GMT+04:00 Ivan Mushketyk :
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Your contrib
e, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for looking into this! I think we can put in the fix and remove one
>> of the tests, yes.
>>
>> @Robert What do you think? I think you initially added this test a loooong
>> while back.
>&g
Hi,
I am trying make small review for slow test and I found small issue:
NonReusingReOpenableHashTableITCase
testSpillingHashJoinWithMassiveCollisions
testSpillingHashJoinWithTwoRecursions
for testSpillingHashJoinWithTwoRecursions exist description
/*
* This test is basically identical to th
longrunning applications print hours without date very
uninformative.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Alexey
2017-01-09 17:25 GMT+04:00 Till Rohrmann :
> Hi Alexey,
>
> this is a good proposal. Could you open a corresponding JIRA issue for this
> change?
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
Hi
Because flink use lazy evaluation and because inactivityCEP don't have any
output then you pattern not apply.
/
inactivityCEP.select(new PatternSelectFunction() {
@Override
public Object select(Map pattern) throws
Exception {
System.out.println(pattern);
return null;
}
});
/
>> What am I mis
Hi
In ExecutionGraphMessages we have code
private val DATE_FORMATTER: SimpleDateFormat = new
SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/ HH:mm:ss")
But sometimes it cause confusion when main logger configured with
"dd/MM/".
What are you thinking about making this format configurable or maybe stay
only HH
11 matches
Mail list logo