Hi, Weiqing.
Thanks for driving this FLIP.
I'm +1 for supporting schema evolution for SQL RowData type.
I just have some questions:
1. Could we consider defining a method returning *SchemaEvolutionSerializer*
in *TypeSerializerSchemaCompatibility* (like
compatibleAfterMigration(TypeSerializer sche
Kartikey Pant created FLINK-37766:
-
Summary: FlinkSessionJob deletion blocked by finalizer when Flink
job already terminal/missing due to HA desync
Key: FLINK-37766
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK
ouyangwulin created FLINK-37765:
---
Summary: Idea import duplicate modules error.
Key: FLINK-37765
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37765
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
> It's mainly used for model evaluation purposes for `ML_EVALUATE`.
Different
loss functions will be used and different metrics will be output for
`ML_EVALUATE` based on the task option of the model. Task option is not
necessary if the model
is not used in `ML_EVALUATE`. `ML_EVALUATE` also has an o
Hi Yunfeng, Ron,
Thanks for the feedback.
> it might be better to change the configuration api_key to apikey
Make sense. I updated the FLIP.
> Why is it necessary to define the task option in the WITH clause of the
Model DDL, and what is its purpose?
It's mainly used for model evaluation purpos
+1(binding)
Best,
Ron
Hao Li 于2025年5月7日周三 00:08写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for driving this!
>
> Hao
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:27 AM Ferenc Csaky
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks for driving this!
> >
> > Best,
> > Ferenc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 6th, 2025 at 14:5
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked Github release tag
- built from source code with Java 8 succeeded
- checked release notes
- reviewed the web PR
- checked the jar was built by JDK 8 version 52.0 (Java 1.8)
Best,
Leonard
> 2025 4月 29 19:55，Yanquan Lv 写道：
>
> H
Hi, Hao
Thanks for starting this proposal, it's a great feature, +1.
Since I was missing some context, I went to FLIP-437. Combining these two
FLIPs, I have the following three questions:
1. Why is it necessary to define the task option in the WITH clause of the
Model DDL, and what is its purpose
Hi, Weijie.
Thanks for your review! Let me try to answer these questions.
1. The nodes between source and join must be included in the whitelist, such as
Calc,
DropUpdateBefore, WatermarkAssigner, Exchange and etc. You can see more in
chapter
"Limitations about Delta Join with Eventual Cons
Hi Hao,
Thanks for the FLIP! It provides a clearer guideline for developers to
implement model functions.
One minor comment: it might be better to change the configuration api_key to
apikey, which corresponds to GlobalConfiguration.SENSITIVE_KEYS. Otherwise
users’ secrets might be exposed in l
Tks kunni, +1
At 2025-04-29 19:55:31, "Yanquan Lv" wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 3.4.0 of
>Apache Flink CDC,
>as follows:
>[ ] +1, Approve the release
>[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
Hi, Flink devs
This proposal makes sense and we need this in our user case. What's the
latest update on this?
Additionally, we are interested in understanding how we could utilize this
to implement a storage partition join, similar to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37375. It seems th
Purshotam Shah created FLINK-37764:
--
Summary: Add support for configurable custom TrustManagerFactory
in SSLUtils
Key: FLINK-37764
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37764
Project: Flin
Hi Ferenc,
Thanks for your question! We agree that a CONNECTION could logically be a
catalog-level resource, especially since it’s intended to be reused across
multiple tables. However, we think there’s value in defining it at the
database level to introduce a layer of isolation and scoping.
This
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for driving this!
Hao
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:27 AM Ferenc Csaky
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for driving this!
>
> Best,
> Ferenc
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 6th, 2025 at 14:50, Sergey Nuyanzin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Thank you for driving this
> > +1 (binding)
> >
+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving this!
Best,
Ferenc
On Tuesday, May 6th, 2025 at 14:50, Sergey Nuyanzin wrote:
>
>
> Thank you for driving this
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025, 12:04 Timo Walther twal...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLI
Hi,
I think the FLIP is in a fairly good state, +1 for the idea and the given
design. This may be considered already, but IMO we should also add some
high-level details, pros, and cons of enabling this feature to the website
other than the config option description.
Best,
Ferenc
On Friday, Ma
Timo Walther created FLINK-37763:
Summary: Support multiple tables with set semantics
Key: FLINK-37763
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37763
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Sub-ta
911432 created FLINK-37762:
--
Summary: No Infomation
Key: FLINK-37762
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37762
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Flink CDC
Thank you for driving this
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 6, 2025, 12:04 Timo Walther wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-520: Simplify StructuredType handling
> [1] which has been discussed in this thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an o
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for driving this!
Best,
Ramin
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 12:04 PM Timo Walther wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-520: Simplify StructuredType handling
> [1] which has been discussed in this thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hour
dalongliu created FLINK-37761:
-
Summary:
BatchJobRecoveryTest.testJobVertexUnFinishedAndOperatorCoordinatorNotSupportBatchSnapshot
test failed of test_cron_azure core pipeline
Key: FLINK-37761
URL: https://issues.ap
Hi, devs,
There haven’t been any further responses to this email over the past few days.
I'd like to initiate a vote on the current proposal[1] in the next few days. If
there are any concerns about this FLIP-519[1], I will gladly pause and make
necessary adjustments.
Best,
Xu Shuai
[1]htt
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-520: Simplify StructuredType handling
[1] which has been discussed in this thread [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection
or not enough votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-520%
Hi Flink Community,
Following the discussion on FLIP-528: Support EXPLAIN EXECUTE STATEMENT SET
Syntax in Flink SQL, the proposal has been thoroughly discussed, and the
main points have been addressed.
So, I'll be starting the voting process tomorrow.
Please review the final version of the FLIP
Hi, everyone!
The next release sync will be held at the following time.
- 14:00, May 7, BJT (GMT+8)
- 08:00, May 7, CET (GMT+2)
- 23:00, May 6, PT (GMT-7)
Everyone is welcome to join via Google Meet [1]. The topics to be discussed
can be found at the Status / Follow-ups section of the release wik
Márton Balassi created FLINK-37760:
--
Summary: Bump parquet version to 1.15.2
Key: FLINK-37760
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37760
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
27 matches
Mail list logo
