roberto hashioka created FLINK-23161:
Summary: Cannot have more than one execute() or executeAsync()
call in a single environment.
Key: FLINK-23161
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23161
Thanks Stephan and Piotr for your replies. It seems that there is no
problem or concern about this feature. If there is no further
objection, I will start a vote thread for FLIP-172.
Thanks,
Wenhao
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:41 PM Piotr Nowojski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 from my side on this idea. I
Hi there,
The voting time of FLIP-171 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
There were four +1 votes, all of which are binding:
- Arvid Heise (binding)
- Danny Cranmer (binding)
- 刘建刚 (binding)
- Piotr Nowojski (binding)
Poitr had some smaller comments on the implementation details of the s
Hi Piotr,
I’m happy to take your guidance on this. I need to think through your proposals
and I’ll follow-up on Monday with some more context so that we can close the
discussion on these details. But for now, I’ll close the vote.
Thanks, Steffen
From: Piotr Nowojski
Date: Friday, 25. June 202
Lian Jiang created FLINK-23160:
--
Summary: upgrade kafka-schema-registry-client to 6.1.2 for
Flink-avro-confluent-registry
Key: FLINK-23160
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23160
Project:
Thanks for the clarification Till. +1 for what you have written.
Piotrek
pt., 25 cze 2021 o 16:00 Till Rohrmann napisał(a):
> One quick note for clarification. I don't have anything against builds
> running on your personal Azure account and this is not what I understood
> under "local environm
One quick note for clarification. I don't have anything against builds
running on your personal Azure account and this is not what I understood
under "local environment". For me "local environment" means that someone
runs the test locally on his machine and then says that the
tests have passed loca
Hi everyone,
@Timo, my comments are inline for steps 2, 4 and 5, please tell me what
you think.
Best
Etienne
On 23/06/2021 15:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
If we want to publicize this plan more shouldn't we have a rough
timeline for when 2.0 is on the table?
On 6/23/2021 2:44 PM, Stephan
+1 (binding) vote with one remark that I posted in the discussion thread.
Best,
Piotrek
pt., 25 cze 2021 o 05:00 刘建刚 napisał(a):
> A common base for implementing sink is really helpful.
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
> liujiangang
>
> Danny Cranmer 于2021年6月24日周四 下午7:10写道：
>
> > Looking forward to s
Hey,
I've just synced with Arvid about a couple of more remarks from my side and
he shared mine concerns.
1. I would very strongly recommend ditching `CompletableFuture ` from
the `protected abstract CompletableFuture
submitRequestEntries(List requestEntries);` in favor of
something like
`org.a
Yun Gao created FLINK-23159:
---
Summary: Correlated sql subquery on the source created via
fromValues() failed to compile
Key: FLINK-23159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23159
Project: Flink
Yun Gao created FLINK-23158:
---
Summary: Source transformation is not added to the
StreamExecutionEnvironment explicitly
Key: FLINK-23158
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23158
Project: Flink
HanWei created FLINK-23157:
--
Summary: Fix missing comma in SQL example in "Versioned Table" page
Key: FLINK-23157
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23157
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Im
zoucao created FLINK-23156:
--
Summary: Change the reference of 'docs/dev/table/sql/queries'
Key: FLINK-23156
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23156
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvem
+1 for the general idea, however I have concerns about a couple of details.
> I would first try to not introduce the exception for local builds.
> It makes it quite hard for others to verify the build and to make sure
that the right things were executed.
I would counter Till's proposal to ignore
15 matches
Mail list logo
