Fang Yong created FLINK-7010:
Summary: Lamdba expression in flatMap throws InvalidTypesException
in DataSet
Key: FLINK-7010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7010
Project: Flink
I
David Brinegar created FLINK-7009:
-
Summary: dogstatsd mode in statsd reporter
Key: FLINK-7009
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7009
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
All:
If I want to connect to 4 streams using RichCoFlatMapFunction. How I can do
this. RichCoFlatMapFunction only support connecting 2 datastream. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/4-DataStream-using-RichCoFlatMapFunction-tp1
Kostas Kloudas created FLINK-7008:
-
Summary: Update NFA state only when the NFA changes.
Key: FLINK-7008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7008
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Impro
Github user zentol closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1
Thanks.
+1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1
@rmetzger I've addressed your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124037728
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSch
Sounds good!
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Chesnay Schepler
wrote:
> I do believe the full dependency version of, say guava, should be apparent
> from the dependency
> declaration of a Flink pom. Just for clarity purposes.
>
> We could still include the full version in the version of the modu
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124035371
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLS
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124034795
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSch
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124034556
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSch
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124033958
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSch
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124033232
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLS
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124032886
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLS
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/1#discussion_r124032645
--- Diff: flink-shaded-guava-18/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLS
Robert Metzger created FLINK-7007:
-
Summary: Add README to "flink-shaded.git" repository
Key: FLINK-7007
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7007
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Task
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I do believe the full dependency version of, say guava, should be
apparent from the dependency
declaration of a Flink pom. Just for clarity purposes.
We could still include the full version in the version of the module though,
i.e
org.apache.flink flink-shaded-guava18
1.0-18.0
On 26.06.20
Greg Hogan created FLINK-7006:
-
Summary: Base class using POJOs for Gelly algorithms
Key: FLINK-7006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7006
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Sub-task
I just opened a PR which should be included in the next bug fix release
for the Table API:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7005
Timo
Am 23.06.17 um 14:09 schrieb Robert Metzger:
Thanks Haohui.
The first main task for the release management is to come up with a
timeline :)
Lets jus
Hi everybody,
Shaoxuan, Timo, and I compiled a list of features from the replies to this
thread, features that didn't make it into 1.3, and some additional ones.
We also graded them by importance, tried to assess the effort, and added
links to JIRAs (some existed already others were created) and e
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2#discussion_r124003439
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ under the License.
org.apache.flink
flink-shaded
-1
+1.0
--- End diff
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2
+1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2#discussion_r124002219
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ under the License.
org.apache.flink
flink-shaded
-1
+1.0
--- End di
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2#discussion_r124001438
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ under the License.
org.apache.flink
flink-shaded
-1
+1.0
--- End diff
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2#discussion_r124001072
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ under the License.
org.apache.flink
flink-shaded
-1
+1.0
--- End di
GitHub user zentol opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/2
Include minor version / remove non-existing guava child module
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zentol/flink-shaded update
Al
Sounds good.
If the libraries follow semantic versioning properly, we could try and only
have the major version in the module name?
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Chesnay Schepler
wrote:
> You're raising good points, now i see why having the version in the name
> is useful.
>
> I'll adjust
You're raising good points, now i see why having the version in the name
is useful.
I'll adjust my PR accordingly. And yes, ideally we only release the
modified modules, not everything again.
On 26.06.2017 14:29, Stephan Ewen wrote:
How should it work when one of the shaded dependencies is u
How should it work when one of the shaded dependencies is updated? We
probably do not want to release all of them, just because the overall
version number is in their version number.
How about that:
- Under normal circumstances, we only increase the version of the root
project, when we add / bu
the guava version is already included in the version of the flink-shaded
module.
For example, for the first release of flink-shaded-guava the version
would be 1-18.0.
1 is the version of flink-shaded itself, 18.0 is the guava version.
On 26.06.2017 14:01, Stephan Ewen wrote:
Looks good, tha
+1 on including dependency version.
Original message From: Stephan Ewen Date:
6/26/17 5:01 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]
Changing Flink's shading model
Looks good, thanks Chesnay!.
How about including the dependency version names in the modu
Looks good, thanks Chesnay!.
How about including the dependency version names in the module names, like
"flink-shaded-guava-18.0"?
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Chesnay Schepler
wrote:
> The new repo was created and is accessible here:
> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded
>
> I've alrea
Timo Walther created FLINK-7005:
---
Summary: Optimization steps are missing for nested registered
tables
Key: FLINK-7005
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7005
Project: Flink
Issu
The new repo was created and is accessible here:
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded
I've already opened a PR to add a shaded guava module.
Once the shaded-guava module is merged I would like to do a first
release of flink-shaded,
only containing guava. I already have a branch with all the
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-7004:
---
Summary: Switch to Travis Trusty image
Key: FLINK-7004
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7004
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
37 matches
Mail list logo
