Hi,
Yes I think it makes sense. :)
Gyula
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016, 17:02 Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I will update the design doc with more details for the Checkpointed
> variants and remove Option 2 (I think that's an orthogonal thing).
>
> The way I see it now, we should have base CheckpointedBase inter
Stephan & Aljoscha,
What I did was a API hack without much thoughts into architect at beginning
:-)
patch attached, I think it would be "tricky" to achieve backward
compatibility with current architect.
We might need to encapsulate "Collectors" to ProcessContext as starting
point.
I would try to
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-4392:
---
Summary: Make RPC Service Thread Safe
Key: FLINK-4392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4392
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Sub-task
Compo
Hey all,
I've noticed a few times now when trying to help users implement particular
things in the Flink API that it can be complicated to map what they know
they are trying to do onto higher-level Flink concepts such as windowing or
Connect/CoFlatMap/ValueState, etc.
At some point it just become
Jamie Grier created FLINK-4391:
--
Summary: Provide support for asynchronous operations over streams
Key: FLINK-4391
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4391
Project: Flink
Issue Type