Chengxiang Li created FLINK-2535:
Summary: Fixed size sample algorithm optimization
Key: FLINK-2535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2535
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvemen
Huang Wei created FLINK-2534:
Summary: Improve execution code in CompactingHashTable.java
Key: FLINK-2534
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2534
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvem
Chengxiang Li created FLINK-2533:
Summary: Gap based random sample optimization
Key: FLINK-2533
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2533
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
+1 as well.
This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
in JIRA, which also being echoed by Fabian.
- Henry
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1 from me as well.
>
> I'd like to add that there are many relevant issues in listed in JIRA that
> repo
+1 from me as well.
I'd like to add that there are many relevant issues in listed in JIRA that
report bugs or describe interesting / important improvements of the system.
Working on one of these issues would be a great contribution to Flink.
Cheers, Fabian
2015-08-16 18:30 GMT+02:00 Sachin Goel
I think skewed graphs can be considered quite common, i.e., not a corner
case.
So if there is code to significantly speed up computations on such graphs,
this would definitely be interesting for Gelly, IMO.
Would it be possible to integrate your approach with existing library
algorithms and offer
+1 for what Henry said.
Recently, several JIRA issues were opened without a detailed description
but which were immediately addressed by a pull request.
This is probably because our coding guidelines state that each PR should
refer to a JIRA issue [1].
The rational behind this guideline is to have
Looks like a rare race between the cleanup (two changes) and the test
validating both changes.
I'll push a fix to make the test more reliable.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hit a failing test in flink-runtime. Not sure if it
Hi,
I hit a failing test in flink-runtime. Not sure if it is known already:
> Failed tests:
> CheckpointCoordinatorTest.testCheckpointTimeoutIsolated:594 expected:<0> but
> was:<1>
Please see: https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/75847501
-Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
I agree!
A good place to start would be to write an extensive JIRA guidelines page,
an example would be
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark.
This is quite crisp and clear.
Further, right now the corresponding guidelines for Flink are on the cwiki
page, but the ma
+1 for formatting templates for Eclipse and IntelliJ.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Sachin Goel
wrote:
> We should also write up a matching configuration file to be used in the
> IDEs and provide it with the source. This might help in reducing any style
> mistakes due to a reformat, which is
We should also write up a matching configuration file to be used in the
IDEs and provide it with the source. This might help in reducing any style
mistakes due to a reformat, which is actually very helpful with spaces
around braces and operators. Especially with Scala, indentations and
continuation
Hi all!
Henry raised the point about non.descriptive bug reports earlier. I would
like to bring this to everyone's mind again and add some additional
thoughts:
We are seeing a lot of issues reported right now, and a lot of pull
requests opened right now, for issues that are not really a problem.
Hi!
I very much support that. A bit stricter rules in the style checkers lead
to more uniform and better readable code. We can have stricter rules both
in Java and Scala.
Note that the hardest part of adding the style checks is actually adjusting
all the existing code that violates the style.
Th
Hi All,
I’m reviewing some pull requests written in Scala. While reviewing, I think
that scala style checker is too loose and documentation about code style
guideline in wiki [1] is poor. The code style for Scala doesn’t seems unified
as that for Java.
I suggest upgrading version of scalastyle
zhangrucong created FLINK-2532:
--
Summary: The function name and the variable name are same, it is
confusing
Key: FLINK-2532
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2532
Project: Flink
Hi All,
Apology for the cross-posting.
Please remember to add detail Description in the JIRA ticket to help
reproduce and prioritize the issues.
Assume that some other people will try to solve and reproduce the issues.
Adding information in JIRA issues is to help describe the issue and
steps to
zhangrucong created FLINK-2531:
--
Summary: combining the "if" branch to improve the performance
Key: FLINK-2531
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2531
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bu
fangfengbin created FLINK-2530:
--
Summary: optimize equal() of AcknowledgeCheckpoint
Key: FLINK-2530
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2530
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
19 matches
Mail list logo