Re: Testing Apache Flink 0.9.0-rc1

2015-06-13 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
The new release candidate is not yet done? We have a very simple fix that allows the RowSerializer of the Table API to work with null-fields. I think we should include that. What do you think? On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 23:50 Ufuk Celebi wrote: > I'm with Till on this. Robert's position is valid as

Re: Listing Apache-2.0 dependencies in LICENSE file

2015-06-13 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
If it is not against the Apache Guidelines I would vote for removing them. I'm always in favour of keeping things simple. On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 18:34 Till Rohrmann wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just updated our LICENSE of the binary distribution and noticed that we > also list dependencies which are

Re: Apache Flink 0.9 ALS API

2015-06-13 Thread Chiwan Park
+1 for generalisation. @Ronny: Could you create a JIRA issue related to this? Regards, Chiwan Park > On Jun 13, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Felix Neutatz wrote: > > Hi Ronny, > > I agree with you and I would go even further and generalize it overall. So > that the movieID could be of type Long or Int a

Re: Apache Flink 0.9 ALS API

2015-06-13 Thread Felix Neutatz
Hi Ronny, I agree with you and I would go even further and generalize it overall. So that the movieID could be of type Long or Int and the userID of type String. This would increase usability of the ALS implementation :) Best regards, Felix 2015-06-10 11:28 GMT+02:00 Ronny Bräunlich : > Hello